Dynamic Performance Comparison of Greenfield and Cross-border Acquisition——Institutional and Organizational Learning Dual-perspective
RU Yi,LV Ping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19616/j.cnki.bmj.2014.12.017
2014-01-01
Abstract:Entry mode selection is an important research topic in the field of international business.One of the important decisions is the choice between greenfield investment and acquisition,namely establishment mode choice.The current studies on this topic mainly focus on entry mode choice decision-making mechanism and influencing factors.But few examine the relationship between establishment mode choice and subsidiary performance,and these relevant studies advantaged conflicting results.This paper argues that existing studies have the following problems to be solved.First of all,some studies based on industrial organization theory ignored the existence of conformity costs especially internal conformity cost which play an important role in subsidiary performance.Second,existing studies neglect the difference of internal and internal conformity costs in terms of occurrence time and method between two establishment modes.Finally,existing static studies cannot reveal dynamic performance difference of two establishment modes.Drawing on institutional and organizational learning dual-perspective,this paper introduces the concept of internal conformity cost and external conformity cost and extends the studies on relationship between entry mode and subsidiary performance based on time dimension.Accordingly,it reveals subsidiary performance variance under different entry modes over time.Using the data of Chinese subsidiaries in Europe,we find that all other things being equal,foreign acquisitions outperform greenfields during the early stage of investment.Overall the subsidiaries perform better over time,but compared with foreign acquisitions,greenfields achieve more obviously stead growth and their performance difference gradually becomes smaller.The main theoretical contributions of this paper are as follows:first,this paper introduces time concept in performance comparison of greenfields and acquisitions,and combining institutional and organizational learning dualperspective,it objectively reveals the subsidiary performance differences under different entry mode over time.This paper thus provides explanation on why extant studies on performance comparison between greenfields and acquisitions proposed competing arguments.Secondly,this paper uses Chinese enterprises which set up subsidiaries in Europe as the empirical test sample while existing studies all use enterprises from developed countries.Few scholars take enterprises from developing countries such as China as the object of studying performance differences because of entry mode choice.Thirdly,this paper extends the relevant studies on China's foreign direct investment while previous studies mainly focus on investment motive,entry mode,location choice.Few scholars study overseas subsidiaries operational performance of Chinese enterprises.It is convinced that the studies on operational performance can help to improve the whole research system.Besides,this paper also puts forward relevant managerial suggestions on entry mode decision,subsidiary operation management,experience accumulation and resource commitment.First,when making entry mode decision,acquisitions provides a shortcut to enter host country industry.However,their integration costs will gradually appear over time.If enterprises pursue long-term steady performance growth,entry mode selection is worthy of careful consideration.Secondly,even though acquisitions are harder to be integrated theoretically than greenfields,such adverse effects caused by integration obstacles can be eliminated by taking effective measures.Chinese companies should strengthen values propaganda and guidance oi these acquisitions.Thirdly,in the early stage after entering foreign markets,top managers should formulate effective business strategies for subsidiaries based on a thorough industrial analysis.These strategies may include marketing differentiation,technical differentiation,scale efficiency,cost efficiency,etc.Lastly,Chinese companies lacking investment experience in Europe should rely more on tangible resources advantage,especially for acquisitions to realize cost efficacy and revenue enhancing synergies.