Re-irradiation Using 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy for Definitive Treatment of 140 Cases of Locally Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

QIU Su-fang,LIN Shao-jun,LU Jun,ZHOU Yan,PAN Jian-ji
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-3969.2011.09.009
2011-01-01
Abstract:Background and purpose:Local recurrences of nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC) may be salvaged by re-irradiation using conventional techniques,but with significant morbidity.Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy(3D-CRT) may improve the therapeutic ratio by reducing doses to normal tissue.The aim of this study was to address the efficacy and toxicity profile of 3D-CRT for 140 patients with locally recurrent NPC.Methods:From May 1997 to Jun.2009,140 patients diagnosed with locally recurrent NPC by biopsy and/or CT/MRI evidence of progressive skull base erosion and clinical symptoms were treated with 3D-CRT.Median time to recurrence was 27.5 months(ranged from 1 to 156 months) after the completion of conventional radiation to definitive dose.50.7% of the cases had rT3-4 classification.Minimum planned doses of 3D-CRT treatment were 59.4-60 Gy in 1.8-2 Gy per daily fraction to the gross disease with margins,with or without chemotherapy.Results:The median dose to the recurrent tumor of reirradiation was 62 Gy(ranged from 50 to 77.4 Gy).With a median follow-up of 25.5 months(ranged from 3 to 135 months),the overall survival(OS),disease-free survival(DFS),locoregional recurrence-free survival(LRRFS) rates at 3-and 5-year were 44.53% vs 31%,42.82 vs 29.13%,44.19% vs 30.76%,respectively.Moderate to severe late toxicities were noted in 48 patients(34.3%).Thirteen patients(9.29%) had posterior nasal space ulceration,21(15%) developed to cranial nerve palsies,20(14.3%) had trismus,and 16(11.4%) suffered deafness.Older age was an adverse prognostic factor.Conclusion:Re-irradiation with 3D-CRT provides reasonable long-term control in patients with locally recurrent NPC with acceptable profile of adverse-effects.The overall survival at 3-and 5-year were 44.53% vs 31%.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?