The Comparative Study of Rest and Adenosine Stress Brain Blood Flow Perfusion Imaging between Using One Day and Two Days Protocol

ZHANG Yiqiu,SHI Hongcheng,GU Yushen,CHEN Shuguang,ZHU Weimin,XIU Yan,LI Beilei
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective:Adenosine was used for pharmacologic stress in brain blood flow perfusion imaging.Rest and adenosine stress 99mTc-ECD brain SPECT were often undergone using two days protocol.This study was to research the feasibility of stress brain blood flow perfusion imaging using one day protocol.Methods:Sixty-four patients with non-organic mental disorders underwent rest and adenosine stress 99mTc-ECD brain SPECT blood flow perfusion imaging.Thirty-two cases were using one day protocol and Thirty-two cases were using two days protocol.Three reference slices in the reconstructive transverse image were selected to draw regions of interest (ROI) in bilateral symmetrical cerebellums,frontal lobes,temporal lobes,parietal lobes and occipital lobes in the normal cerebrum lobes,all of the ROI were the same size.The radioactive counts of each ROI were calculated.The average radioactive counts of bilateral cerebellum ROI were calculated as a reference.The ratio between the radioactive counts of each cerebrum ROI and the average radioactive counts of bilateral cerebellum ROI was calculated.The ratio of adenosine stress and rest cerebral blood flow perfusion imaging was compared using the paired t-test.Results:Among the 194 normal cerebrum ROI in one day group,the ratio between the adenosine stress and rest in the frontal lobe (0.922±0.101 vs.0.905±0.093,P>0.05),parietal lobe (0.876±0.082 vs.0.884±0.097,P>0.05) and occipital lobe (1.029±0.136 vs.1.020±0.125,P>0.05),respectively.All showed no statistical significance.While in the temporal lobe (0.940±0.096 vs.0.905±0.081,P<0.05) showed statistical significance.Among the 174 normal cerebrum ROI in two days group,the ratio between the adenosine stress and rest in the frontal lobe (0.901±0.100 vs.0.956±0.149,P<0.05),temporal lobe (0.923±0.070 vs.0.981±0.090,P<0.05) and parietal lobe (0.840±0.126 vs.0.887±0.091,P<0.05) respectively.All showed statistical significance.While the occipital lobe (1.102±0.146 vs.1.010±0.124,P>0.05) showed no statistical significance.Conclusions:The rest and adenosine stress brain blood flow perfusion imaging using one day protocol is not very feasible suggest.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?