Natural Mercury Isotope Variation In Coal Deposits And Organic Soils

Abir Biswas,Joel D Blum,Bridget A Bergquist,Gerald J Keeler,Zhouqing Xie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es801444b
IF: 11.4
2008-01-01
Environmental Science & Technology
Abstract:There is a need to distinguish among sources of Hg to the atmosphere in order to more fully understand global Hg pollution. In this study we investigate whether coal deposits within the United States, China, and Russia-Kazakhstan, which are three of the five greatest coal-producing regions, have diagnostic Hg isotopic fingerprints that can be used to discriminate among Hg sources. We also investigate the Hg isotopic composition of modern organic soil horizons developed in areas distant from point sources of Hg in North America. Mercury stored in coal deposits displays a wide range of both mass dependent fractionation (MDF, delta Hg-202) and mass independent fractionation (MIF, Delta Hg-211). delta Hg-202 varies in coals by 3 parts per thousand and Delta Hg-201 varies by 0.9 parts per thousand. Combining these two Hg isotope signals results in what may be a unique isotopic "fingerprint" for many coal deposits. Mass independent fractionation of mercury has been demonstrated to occur during photochemical reactions of mercury. This suggests that Hg found in most coal deposits was subjected to photochemical reduction near the Earth's surface prior to deposition. The similarity in MDF and MIF of modern organic soils and coals from North America suggests that Hg deposition from coal may have imprinted an isotopic signature on soils. This research offers a new tool for characterizing mercury inputs from natural and anthropogenic sources to the atmosphere and provides new insights into the geochemistry of mercury in coal and soils.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?