Abstract:In common law jurisdictions, the notion of proof beyond a reasonable doubt is frequently related to notions such as the belief or certainty of a judge or a juror about reality. The notion of balance of probabilities is however related to likelihood or probability. In the present study, we link belief and proof by introducing the notion of epistemic modality, which is concerned with the speaker's belief in propositional probability. The variation in the orientation of epistemic modality helps to integrate the two levels of proof and bridge the apparent test gap between them. The notion of relevance is further introduced in order to clarify the nature of legal proof by taking rape cases as example. This study also provides an integrated model to improve but diversify the expressions in terms of the burden of proof. For most courts, court judgments are processed only according to the general case data, procedural context; such kinds of fact-based information processing and information retrieval seldom help the court to make its decision unless with tremendous and repetitious work. For the consistency and efficiency of court adjudication, it is suggested in the present study that a Knowledge Management (KM) model mainly based on elements and factors which decide or affect the criminal liability. Such a KM model provides an overall framework, though non-exhaustive, and therefore makes court adjudication within narrow discretion and achieves the maximum justice.

On Certainty of Law and Proof of Equity

Gauging Court Adjudication: Qualification And Quantification

Language Modeling for Legal Proof

Blurring View in the Research of Standard of Proof

Truth, knowledge, and the standard of proof in criminal law

The Differences of Standard Proof in the Civil Proceedings in Common Law and Civil Law and Their Reasons

On the Legality Requirements of Evidence in Civil Action

Resolving the Cohenian Paradox in Judicial Probability Theory

The Truth and Proposition in Law:Review On Patterson's Law and Truth

On Company Restricted Equity Transfer Efficacy——A Legal Economics Analysis Based on Judgment of Company Dispute Lawsuit in Jiangsu Province

Legitimate Expectation in Judicial Decision

On Rational Jurisprudence: A Problem in Bayesian Confirmation Theory

Are bond markets and bank credits complementary or substitutable? Evidence based on the rule of law and countries' legal origins

Comparison Between the of Expert Witness Model and the Judicial Identification (Expert Testimony) Model

Is the Science of Evidence Law a Science of Law --Review centered with research subjects

The Analysis on the Power to Prove of Electronic Evidence

Study on the Sociological Model of Conviction and Sentencing

The complementary role of distributive and criminal equity

A Bayesian Model of the Litigation Game

Discussion on Research Methodology of Law of Evidence.

The Practical Interaction and Institutional Coordination between Burden of Proof,Standard of Proof and Evaluation of Proof