Abstract:Students in Higher Education are often resistant to team‐based learning activities and assessments. Student perceptions of positive impacts (learning gains, reduced assessment load and beneficial social interactions) are strongly outweighed by logistical challenges and perceptions of unfairness. Effective planning and support by educators can address these issues. We propose guidance to support effective and engaging team‐based learning tasks and assessments. The ability to work in teams is one of the most sought‐after graduate skills by employers. However, team‐based learning activities, and especially team‐based assessments, are commonly disliked (even actively avoided) by students. Team‐based assessments are often problematic for students, mostly due to logistical problems and interpersonal difficulties. These difficulties often lead to dissatisfaction with the process and poor satisfaction responses in quality assessments of their teaching. This review takes a four‐way approach to evaluate current approaches to team assessment aimed at enhancing student engagement, satisfaction and learning gain. Firstly, we identify why team‐based activity is so important to include in our overall pedagogy in Higher Education. Secondly, we examine evidence from the literature on students' reactions to team‐based activities (especially focusing on assessment) and the reasons for both positive and negative perceptions. The third focus is on identifying the root of the problem from a pedagogic perspective and highlighting the deficiencies in approaches to team‐based activities that might lead to negative student perceptions. Finally, we discuss examples from the literature of where team‐based learning and assessment activities have been successful. Approaches to team‐based activities need to be more proactive and supportive so that students understand the dynamics of teams, how to plan team‐based activities, and how to deal with interpersonal issues positively and productively. Team‐based learning is arguably the least well‐taught element of our curricula, yet it is important and straightforward to address.

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDITY EVIDENCE SUPPORTING A TEAMWORK AND COLLABORATION ASSESSMENT FOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

Translation, Revision and Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale

SAFA: A System for Assisting Fair Assessments in Team Collaboration

Team dynamics feedback for post-secondary student learning teams: introducing the “Bare CARE” assessment and report

Psychometric Validation of a Teamwork Skills Scale in a Vocational Training Context

Leadership/Teamwork Self-Efficacy Scale: Longitudinal Confirmatory Factor Analysis in the Context of an Energy Science Intervention

Development of School Teenagers' Life Skills Scale and its validity and reliability

Construction and Validation of a Measurement Instrument for Attitudes towards Teamwork

Computer-based assessment of collaborative problem solving skills: A systematic review of empirical research

Self-Esteem among University Students: How It Can Be Improved through Teamwork Skills

Making teamwork work: enhancing teamwork and assessment in higher education

Item Response Theory Utilization for Developing the Student Collaboration Ability Assessment Scale in STEM Classes

Collaboration: Report on the Study of Social and Emotional Skills of Chinese Adolescents (III)

Teamwork in Chinese Organizations: A New Concept and Framework

Measuring University Students’ Group Work Contribution: Scale Development and Validation

Developing the School Collaboration Scale Validity and Reliability Study

Who engaged in the team-based assessment? Leveraging EdTech for a self and intra-team peer-assessment solution to free-riding

Development and validation of the Career-related Teacher Support Scale: data from China

Measuring interprofessional collaboration in fluid healthcare teams through the lens of teamness

Measurements of Intercultural Teamwork Competence and Its Impact on Design Students’ Competitive Advantages

Construct validity test of evaluation tool for professional behaviors of entry-level occupational therapy students in the United States