A stable La1.95Ca0.05Ce2O7−δ as the electrolyte for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells

Zetian Tao,Lei Bi,Shuming Fang,Wei Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.03.011

IF: 9.2

2011-01-01

Journal of Power Sources

Abstract:Highlights ► We prepare a novel electrolyte La 1.95 Ca 0.05 Ce 2 O 7− δ for proton-conducting SOFCs. ► The electrolyte is very stable in CO 2 at 700 °C for 100 h. ► The electrolyte is very stable in boiling water for 100 h. ► We prepare the electrolyte with the in situ reaction method. Abstract The La 1.95 Ca 0.05 Ce 2 O 7− δ (LCCO) material is successfully synthesized using the Pechini method. The synthesized powders are exposed to atmospheric CO 2 and H 2 with 3% H 2 O at 700 °C. The treated LCCO powders are investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD) to study the chemical stability. According to the XRD results, LCCO is very stable and shows no reactions with CO 2 or H 2 O. A fuel cell with the LCCO electrolyte is prepared using the suspension spray method and is tested in the range from 600 °C to 700 °C using humidified hydrogen (∼3% H 2 O) as the fuel and static air as the oxidant. An open-circuit potential of 0.832 V and a maximum power density of 259 mW cm −2 are obtained for a single cell with an interface resistance of 0.23 Ω cm 2 at 700 °C. Keywords Pechini method Solid oxide fuel cells Chemical stability Spray In situ sintering 1 Introduction Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) have attracted increasing attention worldwide because of the demand for clean, secure, renewable energy [1,2] . The oxide-ion-conducting SOFCs, which require high operating temperatures to lower ohmic losses, have been the most widely used. However, the operating costs of these SOFCs systems have been too expensive when the fuel cells were operated at high temperatures. A reduction in the SOFC working temperature is urgently required for broad commercialization [3,4] . Doped CeO 2 and proton-conducting SOFCs have been used to satisfy this demand [5–7] . In particular, the proton-conducting SOFCs have attracted more attention due to its low activation energy [8] and high energy efficiency [9] . Many ABO 3 -type perovskites, particularly the rare earth doped BaCeO 3 materials, which exhibit higher proton conductivities, have been used as the electrolyte for the proton-conducting SOFCs [10–14] . However, high proton conductivity and stability seem to be antagonistic, as investigated by Kreuer [15] and Norby and Larring [16] . Several studies to improve the stability of BaCeO 3 have been conducted by our group [17,18] . Furthermore, doped BaZrO 3 materials have also been used as the electrolyte because of their high chemical stability [19] . However, BaCeO 3 are still too unstable to fulfill the needs of commercial application and BaZrO 3 also displays problems with high sintering temperatures and low proton conductivity [20] . Other structural materials have also been used as the electrolyte for proton-conducting SOFCs, such as LaNbO 4 for its high stability [21] . The Ca 2+ doped disordered fluorite structure (found in La 2 Ce 2 O 7 , space group Fm3m) has been investigated for its proton conductivity and is used for the ammonia formation [22,23] . Recently, we proved the proton conductivity using a hydrogen permeation experiment [24] . The disordered fluorite structure could also be used as the electrolyte for the SOFCs. In this study, the chemical stability of the La 1.95 Ca 0.05 Ce 2 O 7− δ (LCCO) powders was studied under atmospheric CO 2 and H 2 O, and no reactions were found during the experiment. Then, the LCCO was used as the proton-conducting electrolyte using a suspension spray method combined with an in situ sintering method [25] to assemble a single fuel cell. Electrochemical properties of the fuel cell were also studied. 2 Experimental LCCO powders were synthesized using the Pechini method. First, a nitrate solution was prepared by dissolving the appropriate stoichiometric ratios of Ce(NO 3 ) 3 ·6H 2 O in a beaker. Then, the La 2 O 3 and CaCO 3 in the appropriate stoichiometric ratio were dissolved in nitric acid and mixed with the prepared solution of Ce(NO 3 ) 3 . The appropriate amount of citrate acid was then added. The solution was heated under stirring to evaporate water until it changed into a viscous gel and finally ignited in a flame, resulting in white ash. The ash was calcined at 500 °C for 3 h to form fine LCCO powders. The powders were treated under 3% CO 2 and 3% H 2 O at 700 °C for 100 h. The change of the phase was examined with an X-ray diffractometer (XRD) using CuKα radiation. These pre-LCCO powders were mixed well with NiO in a weight ratio of 40:60. To produce sufficient porosity in the anode, 20 wt.% starches was added as the pore former. The mixed powders were placed under 250 MPa of pressure with 15 mm in diameter and 0.5 mm in thickness and subsequently fired at 700 °C for 3 h as anode substrates. The LCCO membrane was fabricated on the anode substrate using an in situ reaction. The LCCO powders were dispersed into ethanol by ball-milling for 24 h to form a suspension. The suitable organic additives (triethanolamine, benzyl butyl phthalate and polyvinyl butyral) were added into the suspension, which was employed to distribute the metal oxides and the carbonate in the ethanol. The solid ratio of the starting materials was 5 wt.%. The suspension was directly deposited on the anode substrate. Then, the bi-layers of green electrolyte and anode were co-fired at 1450 °C in air for 5 h. A mixture of LaSr 3 Co 1.5 Fe 1.5 O 10− δ (LSCF) [26] and LCCO was printed on the electrolyte of the half-cell and then fired at 1000 °C for 3 h to form a porous cathode. The electrode active area was 0.237 cm 2 . Ag paste was applied to the electrode as a current collector. Electrochemical measurements of the fuel cell were performed in an Al 2 O 3 test housing that was placed inside a furnace. Humidified hydrogen (∼3% H 2 O) was fed into the anode chamber at a flow rate of 25 mL min −1 , while the cathode was exposed to atmospheric air. The anode side was sealed with Ag paste. Fuel cell performance, based on the I – V curves was measured with a DC Electronic Load (IT8511). Impedance of the cell under open circuit conditions was measured using a CHI604B electrochemical instrument (0.1 Hz to 100 kHz). A scanning electron microscope (SEM, JSM-6301F) was employed to observe the fracture morphology of the assembled cell. 3 Results and discussion As shown in Fig. 1 , the LCCO powders show a fluorite structure without the formation of other phases. To investigate the chemical stability, the powders are exposed to 3% CO 2 and 3% H 2 O at 700 °C for 100 h. The XRD patterns, shown in Fig. 1 , after exposure to these conditions remain unchanged, demonstrating that the LCCO powders are stable in an atmosphere containing 3% CO 2 and 3% H 2 O. We know that the rare earth doped BaCeO 3 materials, which can easily react with CO 2 and H 2 O is the traditional proton-conducting electrolyte [14] . (1) BaCeO 3 + CO 2 → 0.8CeO 2 + BaCO 3 (2) BaCeO 3 + H 2 O → 0.8CeO 2 + Ba (OH) 2 The reactions of the electrolyte materials above can destroy the cell system and reduce the OCV of the assembled cell due to gas leaks. The fluorite structure LCCO does not react with 3% H 2 O and CO 2 at 700 °C for 100 h, which indicates that this material is more stable than many other electrolyte materials. Because of its high chemical stability, LCCO can be used as an electrolyte for SOFCs. Fig. 2 shows the cross-sectional view of the single cell which is sintered at 1450 °C in air for 5 h. As shown, the LCCO electrolyte is approximately 15 μm in thickness and adhered well to the anode and cathode. The fine structure can lower the interfacial polarization resistance to improve the fuel cell performance. From the figure, we also know that the electrolyte is dense which can assure a high open-circuit potential. Fig. 3 presents the I–V and I–P characteristics of the as-prepared cell measured from 600 to 700 °C with humidified hydrogen (∼3% H 2 O) as the fuel. The maximum power densities of 259, 209, and 149 mW cm −2 with the OCV values of 0.832, 0.847 and 0.861 V, respectively, are obtained at 700, 650 and 600 °C, respectively. The OCV of this material is lower than that of the traditional proton-conducting electrolyte at various temperatures; the reduction of Ce 4+ to Ce 3+ provided the electronic conductivity, which lowers the OCV. Although the OCV is lower compared to the traditional proton-conducting electrolyte, the performance of the cell can be compared with the BaCeO 3 -based fuel cell [27] . The single cell is kept stable in the testing condition of 600 °C, as shown in Fig. 4 . From Fig. 4 , we can see that the OCV of the cell is kept almost constant under the working conditions which further prove the chemical stability of LCCO. The resistance of the cell under open circuit conditions, which was investigated by AC impedance spectroscopy, is shown in Fig. 5 (a) . The high frequency intercept corresponds to the overall electrolyte resistance of the cell including ionic resistance of the electrolyte and some contact resistance associated with the interfaces [28] . The low frequency intercept corresponds to the total resistance of the cell. Therefore, the difference between the high frequency and low frequency intercepts with the real axis represents the total interfacial polarization resistance ( R p ) of the cell. As shown in Fig. 5 (b), the total resistance of the cell significantly decreases with the increase in temperature, typically from 1.13 Ω cm 2 at 600 °C to 0.67 Ω cm 2 at 700 °C. The low resistance is comparable to other proton-conducting electrolytes, but the cell performance is lower because of the low open-circuit potential. The open-circuit potential can be increased by adding an additional layer such as ScSZ or YSZ [29,30] . Then the novel electrolyte can be used as a potential electrolyte for the SOFCs by increasing the low open-circuit potential. 4 Conclusion LCCO powders were synthesized by the Pechini method and the XRD patterns indicated that this material had a fluorite structure. The powders were exposed to 3% CO 2 and 3% H 2 O at 700 °C for 100 h to determine the chemical stability, which is urgently required for commercial applications of SOFCs. The unchanged XRD peaks validated the chemical stability of the LCCO and made it a potential electrolyte material for use in SOFCs. With a mixture of LSCF and LCCO as the cathode and a wet suspension approach, a single cell with LCCO as the electrolyte was assembled and tested. The maximum power density of the single cell was 259 mW cm −2 at 700 °C. The overall resistance was 0.44 Ω cm 2 and the polarization resistance of the electrode was 0.23 Ω cm 2 at 700 °C. At 700 °C, the open-circuit potential was only 0.832 V because the electronic conductivity was produced when Ce 4+ was reduced to Ce 3+ . Although the cell performance was lower than that of the traditional proton-conducting SOFCs, the high chemical stability and the possibility of increasing the open-circuit potential with a bi-layer electrolyte indicate that the material can a potentially be a commercially useful electrolyte in SOFCs. Acknowledgements This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.: 21076204 ) and the National High-tech R&D Program of China (Grant No.: 2007AA05Z157 ). References [1] Z.P. Shao S.M. Haile Nature 431 2004 170 [2] T. Norby Solid State Ionics 125 1999 1 [3] B.C.H. Steele A. Heinzel Nature 414 2001 345 [4] K.D. Kreuer Annual Review of Materials Research 33 2003 333 [5] M. Mogensen N.M. Sammes G.A. Tompsett Solid State Ionics 129 2000 63 [6] H. Iwahara T. Esaka H. Uchida N. Maeda Solid State Ionics 3/4 1981 359 [7] H. Iwahara H. Uchida K. Ono K. Ogaki Journal of the Electrochemical Society 135 1988 529 [8] A.F. Sammells R.L. Cook J.H. White J.J. Osborne R.C. MacDuff Solid State Ionics 52 1992 111 [9] A.K. Demin P.E. Tsiakaras V.A. Sobyanin S.Y. Hramova Solid State Ionics 152–153 2002 555 [10] T. Scherban W.-K. Lee A.S. Nowick Solid State Ionics 28 3 1988 585 [11] N. Bonanos B. Ellis K.S. Knight M.N. Mahmood Solid State Ionics 35 1989 179 [12] T. Higuchi T. Tsukamoto H. Matsumoto T. Shimura K. Yashiro T. Kawada J. Mizusaki S. Shin T. Hattori Solid State Ionics 176 2005 2967 [13] Q.L. Ma R.R. Peng Y.J. Lin J.F. Gao G.Y. Meng Journal of Power Sources 161 2006 95 [14] K. Xie R. Yan X. Chen D. Dong S. Wang X. Liu G. Meng Journal of Alloys and Compounds 472 2009 551 [15] K.D. Kreuer Solid State Ionics 97 1997 1 [16] T. Norby Y. Larring Current Opinion in Solid State & Materials Science 2 1997 593 [17] Z. Tao Z. Zhu H. Wang W. Liu Journal of Power Sources 195 2010 3481 [18] L. Bi Z. Tao W. Sun S. Zhang R. Peng W. Liu Journal of Power Sources 191 2009 428 [19] W. Sun L. Yan Z. Shi Z. Zhu W. Liu Journal of Power Sources 195 2010 4727 [20] Y. Yamazaki R. Hernandez-Sanchez S.M. Haile Chemistry of Materials 21 2009 2755 [21] A. Magrasó M.-L. Fontaine Y. Larring R. Bredesen G.E. Syvertsen H.L. Lei T. Grande M. Huse R. Strandbakke R. Haugsrud T. Norby Fuel Cells 2010 10.1002/fuce.201000052 [22] T. Omata K. Okuda S. Tsugi moto S. Otsuka-Matsuo-Yao Solid State Ionics 104 1997 249 [23] J.-D. Wang Y.-H. Xie Z.-F. Zhang R.-Q. Liu Z.-J. Li Materials Research Bulletin 40 2005 1294 [24] S. Fang L. Bi L. Yan W. Sun C. Chen W. Liu Journal of Physical Chemistry C 114 2010 10986 [25] L. Bi S.Q. Zhang S.M. Fang L. Zhang K. Xie C.R. Xia W. Liu Electrochemistry Communications 10 2008 1005 [26] L. Bi S. Zhang L. Zhang Z. Tao H. Wang W. Liu International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 34 2009 2421 [27] R.R. Peng Y. Wu L.Z. Yang Z.Q. Mao Solid State Ionics 177 2006 389 [28] L. Zhang S.P. Jiang W. Wang Y.J. Zhang Journal of Power Sources 170 2007 55 [29] X. Zhang M. Robertson C. Decès-Petit W. Qu O. Kesler R. Maric d. Ghosh Journal of Power Sources 175 2008 800 [30] D. Yang X. Zhang C. Decès-Petit R. Hui R. Maric d. Ghosh Journal of Power Sources 164 2006 182