Abstract:In this essay I propose two different but complementary models with which to think about the relation between the novel and the historical process of globalization. The first—the globalization of the novel—works not with particular textual formations, but with the historical expansion of the novel form hand-in-hand with the colonial enterprise of Western Europe. With this interpretative concept, I review the historical and theoretical parameters that have been used to study both the historical spread of the novel from Europe to the peripheries and the constitution, at the end of the nineteenth and throughout the twentieth century, of a global system of production, reception, and translation of novels. The second model—the novelization of the global—focuses on the production of images of a globalized world as they are constructed in specific novels. My examples are novels by Jules Verne and Eduardo Ladislao Holmberg. While both writers create images of travelers spreading modern bourgeois culture throughout the world and beyond, as might be expected, Verne's images differ significantly from Holmberg's. My claim here is that the particular geopolitical determinations that marked each of these writers produced dissimilar imaginaries of the global reach of their bourgeois characters and plots. Finally, in a coda to this double hypothesis, I connect the interpretative models of the globalization of the novel and the novelization of the global with the rentrée of the concept of world literature. Recently re-introduced to academic debate by Franco Moretti, Pascale Casanova, and David Damrosch, among others, this restored notion of world literature can be understood as an attempt to conceptualize the global ubiquity of the novel since the mid-twentieth century. Here I analyze what could be called the cultural politics of world literature and the critical and pedagogical practices that are derived from this concept. I also examine its underlying claim to address, in academic practices, cosmopolitan expectations related to the production of a discourse about the world based on respect for cultural difference. In other words, my question is whether world literature, as a concept and as a practice, is capable of becoming an effective cosmopolitan discourse.

Dissolution of the Real in Julian Barnes' A History of the World in 101/2 Chapters

Magical Realism, Mythorealism, and the Representation of History in the Works of Yan Lianke

Spatial Change of Literary Criticism

“To Make a History From This Kind of Material is Not Easy”: The Narrative Construction of Cultural History in Contemporary Fiction

The Disenchantment of History and the Tragic Consciousness of Chinese Postmodernity

Experimental History: the Appeal of Postmodernism in Historiography

Historical Writing in Russian Postmodernist Fiction

De-facement of the Subject in the Mirror of Fiction: A de-Manian Reading of E.L. Doctorow’s World’s Fair

Calm and Witty Narration --Yan Lianke's novel Hard as Water

Reinventing Modern China: Imagination and Authenticity in Chinese Historical Writing

Fiction and Repetition: The insight and blindness of deconstructionist criticism

All That Is Solid Falls from the Sky: Modernity and the Volume of World Literature

“Too much blood for good literature”: Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness and the question of realism

Being Of Time Vs. Clock Time: Temporal Experience Of Modernity In The Sound And The Fury

Fictional narrative as history: Reflection and deflection

A Critical Analysis of Structural Realism

The Literary Writing of a"World of Totality":A Revisit to Builders of a New Life

The Inner Differences of Realism in Its Reestablishment Today

Fate of Realism in China

The Globalization of the Novel and the Novelization of the Global. A Critique of World Literature

Historical Facts and Historical Interpretation: A Survey in Light of 20 th Century Western Historical Theories