Clinical prognostic factors influencing the accuracy of dilatation and curettage in diagnosis of tumor grade of endometrial carcinoma

Zhang Hui,Li Weiping,Di Wen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13283/j.cnki.xdfckjz.2009.08.016
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the clinical prognostic factors influencing the accuracy of dilatation and curettage in diagnosis of tumor grade by comparing concordance rate of grade between D&C and final pathologic findings in endometrial carcinoma.Methods:The retrospective study was undertaken on 176 women diagnosed as endometrial carcinoma who were treated in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Renji Hospital,Shanghai Jiaotong University from Jan.1993 to Jan.2008.The accuracy of the endometrial tumor grade(G1,G2,G3) was compared between the preoperative dilatation and curettage and postoperative pathological findings.Those clinical prognostic factors which might influence the accuracy of D&C were analyzed.Results:Based on the postoperative pathological findings,the overall concordance rate between D&C and permanent section was 35.2%(62/176),and the respective concordance rates were in G1 32.5%(13/40),in G2 35.6%(31/87),in G3 45.2%(14/31).50%(88/176)of the tumor differentiation was upgraded,while only 14.8%(26/176) was downgraded.The poorer differentiation of tumor cell meaned the deeper depth of endometrial invasion.The following clinical prognostic factors,including the depth of the uterine cavity more than 9cm,G2 or G3 tumor cell,more than 1/2 myometrial invasion and positive p53 protein expression,could enhance the accuracy of D&C.Conclusion:There is a relatively poor correlation in diagnosis of tumor grade between preoperative grade on D&C and final pathologic analysis.The accuracy of D&C is enhanced in patients with poor differentiated tumor cells or advanced stage of endometrial cancer.Therefore,the information of tumor grade obtained from the D&C should be cautious.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?