Abstract:Milk feedings can be given via nasogastric tube either intermittently, typically over 10 to 20 minutes every two or three hours, or continuously, using an infusion pump. Although the theoretical benefits and risks of each method have been proposed, their effects on clinically important outcomes remain uncertain. To examine the evidence regarding the effectiveness of continuous versus intermittent bolus tube feeding of milk in preterm infants less than 1500 grams. We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to run comprehensive searches in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2020, Issue 7) in the Cochrane Library; Ovid MEDLINE and Epub Ahead of Print, In‐Process & Other Non‐Indexed Citations, Daily and Versions; and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) on 17 July 2020. We also searched clinical trials databases and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi‐RCTs. We included RCTs and quasi‐RCTs comparing continuous versus intermittent bolus nasogastric milk feeding in preterm infants less than 1500 grams. Two review authors independently assessed all trials for relevance and risk of bias. We used the standard methods of Cochrane Neonatal to extract data. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence. Primary outcomes were: age at full enteral feedings; feeding intolerance; days to regain birth weight; rate of gain in weight, length and head circumference; and risk of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC). We included nine randomised trials (919 infants) in this updated Cochrane Review. One study is awaiting classification. Seven of the nine included trials reported data from infants with a maximum weight of between 1000 grams and 1400 grams. Two of the nine trials included infants weighing up to 1500 grams. Type(s) of milk feeds varied, including human milk (either mother's own milk or pasteurised donor human milk), preterm formula, or mixed feeding regimens. In some instances, preterm formula was initially diluted. Earlier studies also used water to initiate feedings. We judged six trials as unclear or high risk of bias for random sequence generation. We judged four trials as unclear for allocation concealment. We judged all trials as high risk of bias for blinding of care givers, and seven as unclear or high risk of bias for blinding of outcome assessors. We downgraded the certainty of evidence for imprecision, due to low numbers of participants in the trials, and/or wide 95% confidence intervals, and/or for risk of bias. Continuous compared to intermittent bolus (nasogastric and orogastric tube) milk feeding Babies receiving continuous feeding may reach full enteral feeding almost one day later than babies receiving intermittent feeding (mean difference (MD) 0.84 days, 95% confidence interval (CI) ‐0.13 to 1.81; 7 studies, 628 infants; low‐certainty evidence). It is uncertain if there is any difference between continuous feeding and intermittent feeding in terms of number of days of feeding interruptions (MD ‐3.00 days, 95% CI ‐9.50 to 3.50; 1 study, 171 infants; very low‐certainty evidence). It is uncertain if continuous feeding has any effect on days to regain birth weight (MD ‐0.38 days, 95% CI ‐1.16 to 0.41; 6 studies, 610 infants; low‐certainty evidence). The certainty of evidence is low and the 95% confidence interval is consistent with possible benefit and possible harm. It is uncertain if continuous feeding has any effect on rate of gain in weight compared with intermittent feeding (standardised mean difference (SMD) 0.09, 95% CI ‐0.27 to 0.46; 5 studies, 433 infants; very low‐certainty evidence). Continuous feeding may result in little to no difference in rate of gain in length compared with intermittent feeding (MD 0.02 cm/week, 95% CI ‐0.04 to 0.08; 5 studies, 433 infants; low‐certainty evidence). Continuous feeding may result in little to no difference in rate of gain in head circumference compared with intermittent feeding (MD 0.01 cm/week, 95% CI ‐0.03 to 0.05; 5 studies, 433 infants; low‐certainty evidence). It is uncertain if continuous feeding has any effect on the risk of NEC compared with intermittent feeding (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.67 to 2.11; 4 studies, 372 infants; low‐certainty evidence). The certainty of evidence is low and the 95% confidence interval is consistent with possible benefit and possible harm. Although babies receiving continuous feeding may reach full enteral feeding slightly later than babies receiving intermittent feeding, the evidence is of low certainty. However, the clinical risks and benefits of continuous and intermittent nasogastric tube milk feeding cannot be reliably discerned from current available randomised trials. Further research is needed to determine if either feeding method is more appropriate for the initiation of feeds. A rigorous methodology should be -Abstract Truncated-

The influences of different feeding methods on feeding tolerance and growth of preterm infants

Influences of different feeding methods on feeding tolerance and nutritional status of preterm infants

Comparison of Three Modalities of Feeding in Preterm Infants ≤32 Weeks and ≤1,250 G: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of Nonnutritive Sucking and Oral Stimulation on Feeding Performance in Preterm Infants: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Continuous versus intermittent bolus milk feeding in preterm infants: a meta-analysis

Effect of Non-nutritive Sucking and Oral Stimulation on Oral Feeding Performance in Preterm Infants

Analysis on the Application Effect of Abdominal Acupoint Massage on Feeding Intolerance in Premature Infants

Infants' first feeds in Hangzhou, PR China.

Clinical observation of extensively hydrolyzed formula effect on premature infant early feeding

Effects of preemptive nasogastric tube placement on improving nutrition and feeding status of infants with congenital heart disease

Evaluation of Intestinal Microbial Metabolites in Preterm Infants with Different Initial Feeding Methods by In Vitro Fermentation Modeling System

The Effect of an Early Oral Stimulation Program on Oral Feeding of Preterm Infants

Growth of Preterm Infants Fed with Preterm or Term Formula: A Multicenter Control Trial

The Effect of In-Hospital Breast Milk Intake on the Gut Microbiota of Preterm Infants

Multi-center Study of Enteral Feeding Practices in Hospitalized Late Preterm Infants in China

Effect of early initiation of enteral nutrition on short-term clinical outcomes of very premature infants: a national multicenter cohort study in China

Study on the application of a phased oral feeding promotion program in preterm infants with gestational age less than 32 weeks

Application of Touching Combined with Intelligent Interaction of Voice and Rhythm in Nursing Care of Newborns with Feeding Intolerance and Its Influence on Quality of Life

Characteristics and influencing factors of enteral nutrition in late preterm infants in Beijing

Continuous nasogastric milk feeding versus intermittent bolus milk feeding for preterm infants less than 1500 grams.

A Multi-center Study on characteristics and influencing factors of hospitalized nutritional status in small for gestational age in infants born late preterm