Abstract:For most of the time during the last two millennia, China was a dynastic empire ruled by an emperor with the assistance of a highly developed mandarinate of imperial organs. “Administrative law” in the modern sense of a set of legal norms enacted by the legislature or developed by the judiciary that simultaneously empower and constrain state organs and officials for the purpose of protecting the rights and liberties of subjects or citizens did not exist in traditional China. But there did exist for more than two millenniums elaborate and sophisticated rules regulating the powers and functions of each component of the highly complex and extensive machinery of imperial organs and officials, and prescribing in detail the duties of officials as well as the multiple and complicated monitoring, supervisory and disciplinary mechanisms applicable to the exercise of powers and performance of duties by officials in different state organs. By the late 19th century, Qing China’s increasing subordination to Western imperialism and semi-colonialism convinced significant numbers of Chinese political and scholarly elite that there was a desperate need for China to “save” and strengthen itself by pursuing modernization. In the legal and political domains, this generally meant extensive borrowing or transplant of Western political and legal institutions. After China's defeat by Japan in the Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895, Japan’s experience of successful modernisation was widely admired by Chinese intellectuals, and the Japanese model was perceived as one that China should imitate in its self-strengthening efforts. This essay will therefore begin with the introduction and reception of Japanese administrative law in China in the late Qing Dynasty. It will then survey the study of comparative law and the influence of foreign law on the development of Chinese administrative law in the Republic of China era (1911–1949) and after the establishment of the People's Republic of China (1949-). Major developments in Chinese administrative law in both the Republican era and the Communist era will also be briefly outlined as the context of administrative law scholarship. It will be seen that the story of the study of comparative and foreign administrative law in modern China is very closely intertwined with the story of the development of Chinese administrative law itself.

Administrative Judical System in the New Deal of the Late Qing Dynasty

Tranditional Political Culture's Influence on China's Administrative Judical System

On the Constitution Normative Foundation of the Legitimacy of Administrative Procedure

The Boundary of “Collecting Mistakes Whenever Discovered”

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

On Administrative System Reform in Rule of Administrative Organization Law

The Systematization and the Reform of Administrative Law Theory in China

Judicial Review System of the abstract administrative Act and Its Improvement In China

The reform of the legal system in the late Qing

Modern Characteristics of Constitutional Government Reform in Late Qing Dynasty

The Chinese Tradition of Administrative Law

How the Courts Develop Administrative Law

Constructing a Judicial Review System to Regulate China’s Administrative Monopoly

Administrative Law and the Chinese Legal System: Some Issues on Judicial Review of Administration Activity

Litigations Without a Ruling: the Predicament of Administrative Law in China

An Analysis of Development of Administrative Law and the Science of Administrative Law of China in the New Century——The View of Legislative Policy Study on Separation of Powers and Centralization of Powers

Logic Foundation and Practical Text of Administration by Law

Discourse on the Legislative Improvement of China Administrative Approval System

THE ORIGIN AND TRANSFORMATION OF JUDICIAL YUAN: FROM THE COMPARATIVE AND HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

Set Up the Judicial Reviewing System of Our Country to the Abstract Administrative Activity

The Status Quo, Problems and Construction of the System of Administrative Action Null and Void in China