Abstract:This is the third article- “Inquiry in the origin of the theory of family, ” in the Japanese Sociological Review. No.6, 1951 and “The background of origin of the theory of family. ” in Memoirs of the Faculty of Liberal Arts & Education of Yamanashi Univ., No. 6, 1955 (both in Japanese) -which was written to criticize the well acknowledged theory which sets the origin of the theory of family in 1861.(I) In this article, I will begin with the problem about the origin of the theory itself. This was the theory which set the origin of the theory of family in Bachofen's Das Mutterrecht. written in 1861, though afterwards Marinowski and others complimented it by Maine's Ancient Law. of 1861. It is generally thought that Engels was the first advocater to set Bachofen's Das Mutterrecht, as its origin in the Vorwort of his Der Ursprung der Familie, des Privateigentums und des Slaats. IV Aufl. (1891). But, it is noteworthy that the previous year 1890, there had been published a book, Tableau des origines et de l'révolution de la familie et de la propriété by Kovalevsky, the first chapter of which was very similar to that of Engels. Both assert decisively that there was not any theory of family but arguments under the influence of Pentateuch which they both affirm as “verbiage” or “nicht die Rede sein”. Both of them coincidently take their origin in Bachofen's theory, though Kovalevsky esteems the study of the primitive peoples which has survived by MacLennan's Primitive Marriage. 1865 along with the historical study of Bachofen. It seems to me doubtful that Engels formed his theory of the origin in 1861 only by himself, because Engels made a few supplements in his IV Aufl. referring them to this book of Kovalevsky.(II) I begin the problem by quoting Russell who say, “ The period of history which is commonly called” modern “has mental outlook which differs from that of the medieval period in many ways. Of these, two are the most important : the diminishing authority of the Church, and the increasing authority of science. ” “ The rejection of ecclesiastical authority which is the negative characteristic of the modern age, begins earlier than the positive charactristic, which is the acceptance of scientific authority. ” “ The first serious irruption of science was the publication of the Copernican theory in 1543 ”(History of western philosophy. 1946. p. 511-2). If so there is some probability of finding arguments on the family without bearing the Pentateuchal stamp very early.Of Trattato della famiglia. by L. B. Alberti (1404-72), W. Sombart (Der Bourgeois. 1913) and Y. Kaneko (Kindai-Humanism to Rinri. 1942) speak in high estimation of its modernistic character, in spite of the fact that M. Weber (Protestantische Ethik und der Geist des Kapitalismus. 1920) shows sceptism of it. Weber conceives that Alberti in stating the economy of family detached economics from religion, and by so doing he had influences upon “die Entwicklung der modernen Wirtschaftslehre (und auch : des modernen Wirtschaftspolitik)”.

The State of Nature and the Family

Unfinished “ Natural Sociability ”：Human Nature and Normativity of the Modern Society

Between Nature and History: the State of Nature and the Historical Turn in the Modern Understanding of Politics

The Nature Of Family Governance: A Contractual Perspective

Why Is the State not a Contracting Party?:A Study of Hobbes's Theory of the State

Study on the Subject of Family Contract and Management Right and the Relationship among Members in Rural Households

The Nature of Public and Familism:Analysis on the Fundamental Principle of Social Building

Family,Community and State:a Research Based on Marx’s Excerpts from Lewis Henry Morgan’s Ancient Society

Two Meanings of the State of Nature——A Commentary on the First one of Two Treatises of Government

The State-Family Community in Ancient China and Its Gradual Changes in China Today (the First Half)

Nature of Liberty

Political Natural Law and Human Dignity: an Empiricist Perspective

Reestablishing the Significance of"Family"in the Modern World

Defining the family as a legal category and a special phenomenon of social relations

Liberty and representation in Hobbes: a materialist theory of conatus

Monogamy and the Construction of Harmony Family——Reflection on Family,Private Property and the origin of State of Engels

Some Problems concerning the Origin of the Theory of Family

Is there Rousseau's Anarchy?

The family in the social consciousness. What (Who) actually forms the family? The social (re)construction of the definition of the family

THE DEFINITION OF FAMILY IN INTERNATIONAL AND EU LAW

Resolution of Dialectics of Nature and 0ntology Boundary Consciousness——Refutation to Opposition of the Dialectics of Domestic Philosophy Community