Comparison between time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay and electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay for detection of serum carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal carcinoma

Qing-Yun Zhang,Li Sun,Shu-Geng Zhang,Qiong Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-3079.2005.23.018
2005-01-01
Abstract:AIM: To evaluate the effect of time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay (TRFIA) and electro-chemilumines-cence immunoassay (ECLIA) for detecting the serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and their influence on the positive rate of serum CEA in patients with colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: Serum CEA levels were detected with both TRFIA and ECLIA in 90 samples from patients with colorectal carcinoma (n = 30), non-colorectal carcinoma (n = 30), and the healthy controls (n = 30). The data were analyzed with statistical software SPSS. RESULTS: The level of CEA was significantly higher in the colorectal cancer group (TRFIA: 44.12±95.27 μg/L, ECLIA: 35.96±71.83 μg/L) than that in the heal- thy control group (TRFIA: 1.04±0.55 μg/L, ECLIA: 0.71±0.48 μg/L) (P <0.01). The sensitivities of TRFIA and ELCIA were 60.0% and 66.7%; the specificities were 98.3% and 100%; the accuracies were 85.6% and 88.9%; the positive predictive rates were 94.7% and 95.2%; and the negative predictive rates were 83.1% and 85.7%, respectively. The results of ELCIA were better than those of the TRFIA, and they were well correlated (r = 0.973 8). There was no significant difference between the two methods (P >0.05). CONCLUSION: There is a good correlation between TRFIA and ECLIA for detection of the serum CEA level. They have high sensitivities and good stabilities, and are suitable for clinical detection of serum CEA.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?