Fluid Management of Hypernatraemic Dehydration to Prevent Cerebral Oedema: A Retrospective Case Control Study of 97 Children in China

Chengqing Fang,Jianhua Mao,Yuwen Dai,Yonghui Xia,Haidong Fu,Yifang Chen,Yaping Wang,Aimin Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2010.01712.x
2010-01-01
Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health
Abstract:Aim:To compare the fluid management of hypernatraemic dehydration in acute gastroenteritis in those who developed cerebral oedema (cases) versus those who did not (controls).Methods:A retrospective study of 97 cases of hypernatraemic dehydration at a tertiary children's hospital in China over five years, in which rehydration regimes of 49 children who developed cerebral oedema were compared with 48 children who made an uneventful recovery.Results:Risk factors for cerebral oedema (vs. no cerebral oedema) were an initial fluid bolus (29/49 vs. 15/48, P = 0.006), the mean rate of bolus infusion (14.7 +/- 2.2 vs. 10.8 +/- 1.4 mL/kg/hr, P < 0.001), the severity of hypernatraemia (serum sodium 167.7 +/- 7.8 vs. 161.3 +/- 7.9 mmol/L, P < 0.001) and the overall rehydration rate (8.2 +/- 1.1 vs. 6.4 +/- 0.6 mL/kg/hr, P < 0.001). On logistic regression, a rapid rehydration rate was the most significant contributor to cerebral oedema. From receive operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, the safe rate of rehydration was < 6.8 mL/kg/hr.Conclusion:The key risk factors for the development of cerebral oedema during recovery from hypernatraemic dehydration were too rapid a rate of rehydration, an initial fluid bolus to rapidly expand plasma volume and the severity of the hypernatraemia. Thus, we conclude that a uniformly slow rate of rehydration is the best way of preventing cerebral oedema.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?