Abstract:BACKGROUND Antisocial personality features in adolescents are frequently associated with delinquency and constitute the problem that most concerns the criminal justice system and the public. Hostile interpretation bias has been identified as a candidate for explaining emergent adolescent antisocial personality problems and aggression, but it is unclear whether offenders and non-offenders show differences in the relationships between hostile interpretation bias, aggression and antisocial personality features. AIMS To compare relationships between hostile interpretation bias and a personality measure between incarcerated teenagers and first year university students and to explore aggression and criminal history as mediating or moderating variables. METHODS Fifty-three 16-18-year-old incarcerated male offenders and 69 17-20-year-old male university students were recruited, the former through institutional staff and the latter by online advert only. Individuals in both groups self-rated, in private, on the Word and Sentence Association Paradigm-hostile (WSAP), The Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ), Hostility Interpretation Bias Task (HIBT) as tests for hostile interpretation bias, and on the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire and on Hyler's Personality Disorder Questionnaire (PDQ-4). Among the students, criminal history was assessed by a self-reported binary question. LASSO regressions were used to test inter-relationships between hostile interpretation bias and aggression or antisocial personality traits. Mediation and moderation were tested using MPLUS 7.4. RESULTS The WSAP and AIHQ, as measures of self-reported hostility bias, had relationships with self-reported aggression (Pearson r 0.24-0.58, p < 0.001) and with antisocial personality features (r 0.36-0.50, p < 0.001), the HIBT did not. Aggression scores mediated the relationship between hostile interpretation bias and antisocial personality features. Furthermore, the relationship between hostile interpretation bias and aggression was stronger among the young offenders (estimates 0.43-0.75) than among the university students without criminal history (estimates 0.13-0.36). CONCLUSIONS Hostile interpretation bias appears to promote antisocial personality features by increasing an individual's aggression, regardless of social status, although the effect was much stronger among the young offenders. To reduce young people's antisocial personality features, future studies should perhaps focus on evaluating strategies to reduce hostile bias or prevent it from being expressed in aggressive behaviours.

Self-control and Premeditated/Impulsive Aggression among Prison Inmates

Self-control strength in prison inmates with antisocial personality disorder

Aggression among College Students:Characterizing Impulsive Aggression and Premeditated Aggression and Their Respective Predictors

The Related Factors to the Violence Behaviors in Young Violent Offenders

The effects of implicit and explicit self-control on self-reported aggression☆

Relationship between executive function and violent crime in male juveniles

Chinese version of impulsive/premeditated aggression scale: Validation and its psychometric properties

The Relationship Between Self-Efficacy and Aggressive Behavior in Boxers: The Mediating Role of Self-Control

Reduced Self-Control after 3 Months of Imprisonment; A Pilot Study

Childhood maltreatment and impulsivity in offenders: Examining the mediating roles of self-compassion and cognitive reappraisal

Trait anger and aggression among male violent offenders: The mediating effect of sadistic impulse and the moderating effect of emotion regulation

Attentional variability and avoidance of hostile stimuli decrease aggression in Chinese male juvenile delinquents

Assessing Two Measurements of Self-Control for Juvenile Delinquency in China

A comparison of the role of aggression in the association between hostile interpretation bias and antisocial personality features between young offenders and university students.

Intermittent Explosive Disorder in Male Juvenile Delinquents in China

Engaging in prosocial behavior explains how high self-control relates to more life satisfaction: Evidence from three Chinese samples

The investigation on impulsive and aggressive personality traits affecting college students self-injury sui-cide behavior

Correlation between aggression and impulsivity in male schizophrenic patients

The relationship between sense of security and suicide risk in male prison inmates: a chain mediating effect through intolerance of uncertainty and motor impulsiveness

Peer assumption: an illusory consensus hidden in the criminal responsibility of juvenile offender—evidence from psychology

High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success.