The diagnostic effect of detect methods of liquid based cytology,colposcope and fluorescence in situ hybridization in the cervix disease

XU Bin,WU Chang-Ping,JIANG Jing-ting
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-4287.2010.10.026
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective Compare the diagnostic efficiency of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions between the liquid-based cytology test(TCT method),Colposcopy detection and fluorescence in situ hybridization(FISH) method,To explore the clinical significance with individual and joint testing.Methods To collect 115 cytologic samples of cervix in the Third Affiliated Hospital of Suzhou University from November 2007 to February 2009,54 cases of CIN patients,25 cases of cervical cancer patients and 36 cases of health women.All the cytology samples were both detected by the method of TCT and the method of fluorescence in situ hybridization(FISH).the CIN patients and cervical cancer patients accepted the colposcopy among the total.Results The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy to detect cervix uteri cancer were 52.0%,100% and 84.8% respectively by the method of liquid-based cytology.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy were 72.0%,94.2% and 84.8% respectively by the method of Colposcopy detect.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy were 92.0%,72.2% and 78.5% respectively by the method of FISH.The positive expression rate of hTERC gene in the normal,CINI patients,CINIⅠ/Ⅲ patients and cervix uteri cancer was 2.8%,6.7%,35.9% and 92.0%,there was a statistically significance between the groups(P<0.05).Conclusion There is a complementation between the detect of hTERC which with higher sensitivity and the detects of TCT and colposcopy which with higher specificity.There was a close correlation between amplification of hTERC and histological grade.The evidence of hTERC might serve as a prognostic indicator to measure the grade of lesion.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?