Abstract:Humans have now lived aboard the International Space Station (ISS) for 20 years ([ 1 ][1]). As we look toward the next 20 years, we must address the dangers that space debris poses to both manned missions and crucial satellites. National policy-makers and international organizations must develop actionable rules and regulations that preserve our ability to explore space.With tens of millions of pieces of space junk rocketing around our planet at thousands of kilometers an hour, debris is a substantial threat to our expanding networks of satellites and even the ISS itself ([ 2 ][2]–[ 4 ][3]). The European Space Agency (ESA) puts much of the blame on the failure to properly dispose of expiring satellites ([ 2 ][2]). The recently signed Artemis Accords similarly point to the value of "end-of-mission planning and implementation [and…] post-mission disposal" in reducing debris ([ 5 ][4]). With the rapid expansion of the satellite orbital population—many of which are relatively cheaply produced with comparatively high failure rates ([ 6 ][5])—this problem will likely get much worse before it gets better.Unfortunately, Cold War cooperation led to rules designed primarily for nation states, not for the corporations that are now launching literally thousands of new satellites. Meanwhile, the nation states have mostly neglected to implement the necessary local space regulations that would promote the long-term sustainability of equitable space exploration. This tragedy of the commons will damage the space environment and eventually impair commercial space endeavors. Space debris threatens efforts ranging from the emerging mini-satellite mega-constellations that aim to democratize internet access to space tourism. In a worst case scenario, orbital debris could start a self-sustaining cascade of destruction that would litter the Low Earth Orbit with enough debris to make it effectively unusable ([ 7 ][6]).To maintain a sustainable space environment, all states and their nationals must take responsibility for reducing the creation of new space debris. Both nations and private corporations should design more reliable satellites that are less likely to malfunction, deorbit satellites before they become inoperable and hazardous, and promote the emerging private-sector industries that are collecting defunct satellites and repairing and refueling older satellites. Developing public-private collaborations can enhance the tracking of even small man-made particles zooming around in orbit.The United Nations' Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS) may be the most appropriate forum to accomplish these goals. COPUOS can provide both the desperately needed development of norms, the required regulatory support, and the necessary scientific and technical expertise to direct these efforts. During the past 20 years, astronauts on the ISS have conducted space-based research representing the work of scientists from more than 100 countries ([ 1 ][1]), and science diplomacy has often prefaced cross-boundary collaboration on Earth. We must preserve the amazing opportunities space exploration provides by developing better sustainable practices before it is too late.1. [↵][7]National Aeronautics and Space Administration, "International Space Station facts and figures" (2020); [www.nasa.gov/feature/facts-and-figures][8]. 2. [↵][9]ESA, "The current state of space debris" (2020); [www.esa.int/Safety\_Security/Space\_Debris/The\_current\_state\_of\_space_debris][10]. 3. ESA, "Space Debris by the numbers" (2020); [www.esa.int/Safety\_Security/Space\_Debris/Space\_debris\_by\_the\_numbers][11]. 4. [↵][12]1. R. Khatchadourian , "The elusive peril of space junk," The New Yorker (2020). 5. [↵][13]"The Artemis Accords: Principles for cooperation in the civil exploration and use of the Moon, Mars, Comets, and Asteroids for peaceful purposes" (2020), pp. 6–7; [www.nasa.gov/specials/artemis-accords/img/Artemis-Accords-signed-13Oct2020.pdf][14]. 6. [↵][15]1. S. A Jacklin , "Small-satellite mission failure rates," NASA Technical Memorandum (2019); . 7. [↵][16]1. D. J. Kessler , J. Spacecraft Rockets 18, 357 (1981). [OpenUrl][17] [1]: #ref-1 [2]: #ref-2 [3]: #ref-4 [4]: #ref-5 [5]: #ref-6 [6]: #ref-7 [7]: #xref-ref-1-1 "View reference 1 in text" [8]: http://www.nasa.gov/feature/facts-and-figures [9]: #xref-ref-2-1 "View reference 2 in text" [10]: http://www.esa.int/Safety_Security/Space_Debris/The_current_state_of_space_debris [11]: http://www.esa.int/Safety_Security/Space_Debris/Space_debris_by_the_numbers [12]: #xref-ref-4-1 "View reference 4 in text" [13]: #xref-ref-5-1 "View reference 5 in text" [14]: http://www.nasa.gov/specials/artemis-accords/img/Artemis-Accords-signed-13Oct2020.pdf [15]: #xref-ref-6-1 "View reference 6 in text" [16]: #xref-ref-7-1 -Abstract Truncated-

A Study on the Legal Issues of Space Assets Security:an International Law Perspective

A Panacea to Address the Legal, Administrative and Economic Aspects of Space Debris

Research on System Concept and Key Technologies of Space-based Anti-satellite Kinetic Missile

Upgrading Space Debris Mitigation Measures to Cope with Proliferating Cyber Threats to Space Activities

The Status of the Operational Debris Mitigation Systems Regulatory Policy: Current Issues and Future Perspectives

Autonomous Space Objects and International Space Law: Navigating the Liability Gap

Satellite constellations: International legal and technical aspects

Back to the Moon and Beyond: Strengthening the Legal Framework for Protection of the Space Environment

Assessing the Principle of Equitable Access versus Non-Appropriation in the Era of Mega-Constellations

Regulatory Context of Conflicting Uses of Outer Space: Astronomy and Satellite Constellations

Large satellite constellations and space debris: Exploratory analysis of strategic management of the space commons

Potential Export Control Challenges and Constraints for Emerging Space Debris Detection and Removal Technologies: The Case of On-Orbit Collision

Outer space (cosmic) private law

Outer Space, the Final Frontier of Cyberspace: Regulating Cybersecurity Issues in Two Interwoven Domains

Outer Space Commercial Mining: Ownership Rights and Contemporary Legal Issues

Navigating AI-lien Terrain: Legal liability for artificial intelligence in outer space

Space debris puts exploration at risk

Why Space Debris Flies Through Regulatory Gaps

Sanctuary lost: a cyber-physical warfare in space

Title IV Space Resource Exploration and Utilization of the US Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act: A Legal and Political Assessment

Space War and the Regressive Development of the Principle of Common Heritage of Humankind: Legal vs. Technological Weapons