Synthetic and Field Examples of Ground‐penetrating Radar (GPR) Profile Improvement Using Two‐phase Detection Techniques

GY Fang,M Pipan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1567224
IF: 3.264
2003-01-01
Geophysics
Abstract:Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) has been used extensively in a wide range of subsurface imaging applications, including underground utilities, hazardous waste and liquid contaminants, buried archeologic sites, geological interfaces (fractures, bedding planes), and pavement–concrete structure assessment (Hugenschmidt, 2000; Olhoeft and Smith, 2000). In the latter case, industrial applications such as damage assessment before road rehabilitation require processing and analysis of data sets that may be orders of magnitude larger than normal GPR ones. In such conditions, the reliable identification of radar echoes in a large range of S/N ratio values can be exploited to apply automatic tracking algorithms for a cost-effective interpretation. A number of studies deal with applying GPR to pavement assessment (Hugenschmidt et al., 1998; Saarenketo and Scullion, 2000), analyzing water content in the pavement or in the subgrade (Benedetto and Benedetto, 2002; Emilsson et al., 2002), and implementing or exploiting automatic tracking algorithms to interpret GPR data sets from pavement surveys Spagnolini and Rampa, 1999). Anomalous lateral variations in water content of the pavement and subgrade are recognized as a major source of pavement damage. At the same time, they affect the radar response by causing an overall decrement of the S/N ratio, most probably because of the defects (primarily delamination and cracks) produced by the anomalous saturation. No examples exist in the available literature of dedicated processing techniques to improve the detection of weak transients in low S/N ratio conditions and to enhance the performance of automatic tracking methods. In this work we exploit wavelet transform-based instantaneous parameter analysis for this purpose and compare the results with those obtained by Hilbert transforms on synthetic and real GPR data.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?