Retrograde Versus Antegrade Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures

仲飙,孙辉,潘垚,罗从风

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-5572.2008.04.004

2008-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare union rates and complications of retrograde intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures with those of antegrade intramedullary nailing.Method Seventy-two patients with fractures of the femoral shaft who underwent stabilization with closed reduction and reamed intramedullary nailing were prospectively studied.In those 72 patients,34 patients were treated with retrograde inserted femoral nails and 38 patients were treated with antegrade inserted femoral nails.All those patients were followed at least once,and the average clinical follow-up was nineteen months(range 6 to 31 months).Results Healing occurred in thirty-two of the femurs in the retrograde group,and there were delayed unions and four malunions.Healing occurred in thirty-five of the femurs in the antegrade group,and there were five delayed unions and three malunions.The incidence of knee pain was twenty-four in the retrograde group and nine in the antegrade group when patients with knee pain before operation were excluded.The incidence of hip pain was one in the retrograde group and six in the antegrade group when patients with hip pain before operation were excluded.Conclusion Retrograde and antegrade nailing techniques provided similar results in union rates.There were more complications related to the knee after retrograde nailing and more complications related to the hip after antegrade nailing.