Abstract:Summary Objective 1. To investigate the discriminatory and diagnostic power of nonlinear dynamic analysis measures concerning voices from normal, benign, and malignant voice disorders. 2. To study the correlations of nonlinear dynamic analysis measures with perceptual ratings to evaluate the reliability of the objective acoustic analysis in predicting severity of voice. Method The perturbation analysis metrics used were Jitter%, Shimmer%, and signal-to-noise ratio. The nonlinear dynamic analysis metrics used were spectrum convergence ratio (SCR), nonlinear energy difference ratio (NEDR), and rate of divergence (ROD). Subjects were enrolled and divided into three groups based on laryngeal pathology: normal, benign, and malignant. Vowel sound and reading samples were recorded. Perceptual evaluation was applied to these voice samples to investigate correlations between metrics and auditory perception. Result Each metric was capable of discriminating laryngeal pathology, except for SCR in the case of distinguishing between benign and malignant pathologies. Perturbation analysis parameters had a moderate ability to differentiate between normal and benign pathologies, but were unable to characterize malignant pathologies for certain diseases, such as Reinke's edema. All metrics significantly correlated with perceptual G scores. Nonlinear dynamic analysis was superior when applied to cases of severe dysphonia, where linear metrics such as Jitter% and Shimmer% tended to lose utility. NEDR and ROD were successful at differentiating between the different pathologies, whereas SCR could not discriminate between the benign and malignant groups. Conclusion Perturbation and nonlinear dynamic analyses are comparable in their discriminating power with respect to normal and benign voices, and normal and malignant voices. The nonlinear dynamic analysis metrics NEDR and ROD may be superior in clinical settings with respect to discriminating voice pathology ranging from mild pathological voice to severe dysphonia, and with respect to discriminating benign and malignant voice. SCR was found unable to discriminate pathological voices.

Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis in Voices Signal from Patients with Vocal Polyps and Cysts

Objective Acoustic Analysis of Pathological Voices from Patients with Vocal Nodules and Polyps.

Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis and Perturbation Measurement Used for Discriminating Pathological Voices and Their Correlations With Perceptual Evaluation

Perturbation and Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses of Voices from Patients with Unilateral Laryngeal Paralysis

Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Voices Before and after Surgical Excision of Vocal Polyps

Comparison of Nonlinear Dynamic Methods and Perturbation Methods for Voice Analysis

Acoustic Analysis of Aperiodic Voice: Perturbation and Nonlinear Dynamic Properties in Esophageal Phonation

Describing Pediatric Dysphonia with Nonlinear Dynamic Parameters

Acoustic Analyses of Sustained and Running Voices from Patients with Laryngeal Pathologies.

A Study of Areo-dynamics on Patients with Abnormal Lung Function

Nonlinear Dynamics of Voices in Esophageal Phonation.

Identification and analysis of Nonlinear behaviors of vocal fold biomechanics during phonation to assess efficacy of surgery for benign laryngeal Diseases

Phonatory Impairment in Parkinson's Disease: Evidence from Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis and Perturbation Analysis

Nonlinear Dynamic-Based Analysis of Severe Dysphonia in Patients with Vocal Fold Scar and Sulcus Vocalis

High-speed Image Analysis Reveals Chaotic Vibratory Behaviors of Pathological Vocal Folds

Perturbation and Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Adult Male Smokers.

Clinical Characteristics and Acoustics Evaluation in Patients with Muscular Tension Dysphonia

Nonlinear dynamic analysis of pathological voices

Spatiotemporal Analysis of Normal and Pathological Human Vocal Fold Vibrations

Polyps and paralysis phonation classification with nonlinear dynamics model

Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Disordered Voice: The Relationship Between the Correlation Dimension (D2) and Pre-/Post-Treatment Change in Perceived Dysphonia Severity