Abstract:China’s diplomatic approach under Xi Jinping is notably distinct from previous eras. Instead of pursuing the road of peaceful development, China appears to have abandoned its self-positioning as a “ancient civilized country” and has grown increasingly aggressive in the international community. Western academics and journalists have even coined the term “war wolf diplomacy” to characterize this trend. However, the author contends that this transformation is unavoidable since China is in the process of discovering itself, which implies that it is modifying its foreign policy in response to the genuine demands of its own development, defining its diplomatic “dao”. One of the most significant aspects in this procedure is the “shi” and only by accurately assessing, following, and planning the “shi” can the aforementioned duties be completed more effectively and finally achieve the aim of successful rising. In this paper, the author not only discusses classical Chinese philosophical writings in order to select key points from the sages’ thought for analyzing and explaining modern Chinese foreign policy, but also demonstrates some of the more successful theoretical constructions of the Chinese school of international relations theory. The author begins the first part by debating the “Way of the King” and “hegemony strategy”, pointing out that currently China’s foreign policy applies both concepts, with the former principle assisting China in implementing the fundamental principal of “not solving international problems by force”. While the “hegemonic” strategy is largely utilized to give a powerful reaction to external challenges, as indicated by the rising number of (counter)sanctions imposed in recent years. The author wants to present a reasonable explanation for China’s change in foreign policy style in the second half of the paper. According to him, this change represents a sound strategic decision by the Chinese leadership to “act in line with the ‘shi’”. However, because the transformation is still in its early stages, it is not yet feasible to foresee the eventual conclusion, therefore the overall trend in China’s foreign policy today should be judged in a way that does not unnecessarily laud or discredit it.

Sovereignty, Human Rights, and Responsibility: Changes in China’s Response to International Humanitarian Crises

China and the Responsibility to Protect

China’s human rights foreign policy in the Xi Jinping era: Normative revisionism shrouded in discursive moderation

A fox in the henhouse: China, normative change, and the UN Human Rights Council

The dynamics of China’s attitude towards implementing the responsibility to protect in the Middle East and North Africa

Human Rights Lawmaking in China: Domestic Politics, International Law, and International Politics

Debating China'S International Responsibility

China and the International Human Rights Regime

Expanding China’s Influence via Membership: Examining the Influence of Chinese-Led International Institutions on Responses to Human Rights Issues in China

Double-Speaking Human Rights: Analyzing Human Rights Conception in Chinese Politics (1989–2015)

China's Conception of and Participation in the UN Peacekeeping Operation

China's adherence to international human rights treaties: An empirical assessment

China'S Evolving Motivations And Goals In Un Peacekeeping Participation

Human rights in modern ideology of the Communist Party of China

Three legacies of humanitarianism in China

China And Russia In R2p Debates At The Un Security Council

How to Think about Cyber Sovereignty: the Case of China

The Dragon in Turtle Bay: The Impact of China’s Rise in the UN on the United States and Global Governance

On China’s Modern Foreign Policy Through the Prism of the Concepts of “Dao” and “Shi”

Two Chinese tales of human rights– Mainland China’s and Taiwan’s external human rights strategies

China's Approach to Dealing with Crisis and Change in Global Governance