Why Do Poverty Rates Differ from Region to Region? the Case of Urban China
Yin Zhang,Guanghua Wan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860500291646
2005-01-01
Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy
Abstract:ABSTRACT This paper proposes a semi-parametric method for poverty decomposition, which combines the data-generating procedure of Shorrocks and Wan (2004) Shorrocks, A. and Wan, G. 2004. “A simple method for generating income data from Lorenz coordinates”. Mimeo, Helsinki, , Finland: World Institute for Development Economics Research, United Nations University. [Google Scholar] with the Shapley value framework of Shorrocks (1999) Shorrocks, A. 1999. Decomposition procedures for distributional analysis: a unified framework based on the Shapley value, Mimeo: University of Essex. [Google Scholar]. Compared with the popular method of Datt and Ravallion (1992) Datt, G. and Ravallion, M. 1992. Growth and redistribution components of changes in poverty measures: a decomposition with application to Brazil and India in the 1980s. Journal of Development Economics, 38: 275–295. [CSA][Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar], our method is more robust to misspecification errors, does not require the predetermination of functional forms, provides better fit to the underlying Lorenz curve and incorporates the residual term in a rigorous way. The method is applied to decomposing variations of urban poverty across the Chinese provinces into three components – contributions by the differences in average nominal income, inequality and poverty line. The results foreground average income as the key determinant of poverty incidence, but also attach importance to the influence of distribution. The regional pattern of the decomposition suggests provincial groupings based not entirely on geographical locations.