Logistic Regression Analysis of the Outcome on 90d and Associated Factors in Conscious Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Zhi-gang ZHEN,Zhi-hong GAO,Sheng ZHANG,Li-yan WANG,Jin-chao WANG,Yi-ning HUANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2013.09.015
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the outcome on 90 d an d influencing factors for the outcome in conscious patients with intracerebral hemorrhage(ICH).Metho dsTwo hun dre d an d twenty five patients with ICH were a dmitte d to our hospital within 6 h after onset an d were suitable to be treate d with me dical conservative therapy. Patients were divi de d into two groups, the conscious group [Glasgow Coma Scale(GCS) score ≥ 9] an d the coma group(GCS score ≤ 8). Clinical features inclu ding gen der, age,National Institute of Health Stroke Scale(NIHSS) score, etc, were recor de d. The prognosis of these patients on 90 d after onset was evaluate d by the following in dex: survival or death; favorable prognosis [mo difie d Rankin Scale(mRS) score ≤ 2] or unfavorable prognosis(mRS score ≥ 3, death or severe disability). The difference of clinical features an d prognosis between the conscious group an d coma group was explore d.The prognosis of the patients in conscious group was analyze d, an d influencing factors for prognosis were explore d.ResultsMultifactorial Logistic regression analysis in dicate d that hyperglycemia, higher NIHSS score, rehemorrhagia an d hematemesis were in depen dent risk factors for 90 day mortality. On the other han d, a dvance d age, higher NIHSS score, rehemorrhagia an d hematemesis were in depen dent risk factors for death or severe disability on 90 day.ConclusionIn ICH patients who were conscious on a dmission,hyperglycemia, a dvance d age, higher NIHSS score, rehemorrhagia an d hematemesis are strong pre dictors for mortality an d unfavourable outcome. Controlling hyperglycemia an d prevention of rehemorrhagia an d hematemesis are important elements for re ducing 90 day mortality an d severe disability.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?