Application of Swartz Sheath Vs Standard Sheath for Ablation Right-sided Accessory Pathway

陶海龙,张金盈,李凌,张力,李晨
2010-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the application of Swartz sheath versus standard sheath in mapping and ablation of right accessory pathways(RAP).Methods A total of 42 patients with RAP were divided into Swartz sheath(group A) and standard sheath(group B) for mapping and ablation.The acute success rate of ablation,operation time,fluoroscopy time and complication of each groups were observed and compared.The long term efficacies of ablation were studied and compared either.Results During mapping and ablation,35 patients were RAP of free wall,six were posteroseptal RAP and one was anteroseptal RAP.All patients were successfully ablation in Swartz group while in standard sheath group 1 patient accessory pathway conduction recovered but success ablation via Swartz sheath.The firing times,operation time and fluoroscopy time were more decreased in Swartz group than that of standard sheath group(2.1±0.2)vs.(4.1±1.3),P0.05;(2.1±1.1)h vs.(3.4±1.1)h,P0.05;(20±2.8)min vs.(38±10.5)min,P0.05).One SVT occurred in standard sheath group while no recurrent patients were observed in Swartz group during follow up.Conclusion Mapping and ablation via Swartz sheath will improve the efficacy of RAP ablation and reduce fluoroscopy and operation time.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?