Abstract:Although these have been so many theory papers looking into the value of commitment in the contracting process,empirical analyses remain rare. In this paper, by investigating the ownership split reform in China, we empirically analyze the role of commitment. Our results show that commitment plays an important role in the contracting process：It decreases the reform costs for the nontradable shareholders and tradable shareholders also positively respond to the commitment. Thus, overall making commitment has economic value and is a Pareto improvement. However,our further analyses also reveal that not all nontradable shareholders can make credible commitment that would be accepted by tradable shareholders：The economic value of commitment depends on the reputation and also on the contracting environments. This implies that governments dedicate to improving contracting environments will be helpful to improve economic efficiency.

Contract, Commitment and Institutions： Evidence from the 2005 Ownership Reform in China