Does "Rule of Law Resist Interpretation"?

FAN Jin-xue
2008-01-01
Abstract:Resently, Prof. Chen Jinzhao put forward an influential proposition: "rule of law resists interpretation". Some problems are inside and related to this proposition. "Rule of law resists interpretation" is a pseudo proposition. The reality is that, rule of law resists excessive interpretation. "Taking rules seriously" does not constitute a reason resisting interpretation. The proposition that "mandatory rules resist interpretation" should be analyzed more in detail. Creative interpretation is not the nature of judicial process, but only a supplement to general interpretation method. Creative interpretation is not the mainstream of western view, but only the idea of judicial activism. To rule of law, the most importaht problem is how to interpret.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?