Abstract:Objective: To establish the finite element model of spinal canal reconstruction and internal fixation,analysis influence of spinal canal reconstruction and internal fixation on spinal stability,and verify the effectiveness and reliability of spinal canal reconstruction and internal fixation in spinal canal surgery. Methods: A 30-year-old male healthy volunteer with a height of 172 cm and weight of 75 kg was selected and his lumbar CT data were collected to establish a finite element model of normal lumbar L3-L5,and the results were compared with in vitro solid results and published finite element analysis results to verify the validity of the model. They were divided into normal group,laminectomy group and spinal canal reconstruction group according to different treatment methods. Under the same boundary fixation and physiological load conditions,six kinds of activities were performed,including forward bending,backward extension,left bending,right bending,left rotation and right rotation,and the changes of range of motion (ROM) of L3-L4,L4-L5 segments and overall maximum ROM of L3-L5 were analyzed under the six conditions. Results: The ROM displacement range of each segment of the constructed L3-L5 finite element model was consistent with the in vitro solid results and previous literature data,which confirms the validity of the model. In L3-L4,ROM of spinal canal reconstruction group was slightly increased than that of normal group during posterior extension(>5% difference),and ROM of other conditions was similar to that of normal group(<5% difference). ROM in laminectomy group was significantly increase than that in normal group and spinal canal reconstruction group under the condition of flexion,extension,left and right rotation. In L4-L5,ROM in spinal canal reconstruction group was similar to that in normal group(<5% difference),while ROM in laminectomy group was significantly higher than that in normal group and spinal canal reconstruction group(>5% difference). In the overall maximum ROM of L3-L5,spinal canal reconstruction group was only slightly higher than normal group under the condition of posterior extension(>5% difference),while laminectomy was significantly higher than normal group and spinal canal reconstruction group under the condition of anterior flexion,posterior extension,left and right rotation(>5% difference). The changes of each segment ROM and overall ROM of L3-L5 showed laminectomy group>spinal canal reconstruction group>normal group. Conclusion: Laminectomy could seriously affect biomechanical stability of the spine,but application of spinal canal reconstruction and internal fixation could effectively reduce ROM displacement of the responsible segment of spine and maintain its biomechanical stability.

Establishment of calf model of spinal fracture type A for biomechanical evaluation of spinal internal fixator

Establishment of Finite Element Model of Anterior Cervical Transpedicular System for Reconstruction of Cervical Stabili-Ty after Subtotal Resection of Two Segments of Lower Cervical Spine

The biomechanical study of a modified lumbar interbody fusion-crenel lateral interbody fusion (CLIF): a three-dimensional finite-element analysis.

Biomechanical Analysis of the External Fixation in a Lumbar Fracture Model: A Finite Element Study

Comparison of the Biomechanical Performance of Three Spinal Implants for Treating the Wedge-Shaped Burst Fractures

Biomechanical study of transpedicular fixation via injured vertebra plus connector for short-segment instrumentation of the spinal fracture

Computer Aided Design and Evaluation of New Anatomic Fixation System on Entire Pelvic Model

Biomechanical Comparative Study of Single-Level Anterior Intervertebral Decompression and Fusion with Three Kinds of Plates

Biomechanical Comparison of Two Types of Posterior Pedicle Instrumentation

Multiaxial inter-vertebral and vertebral pedicle pedicle screw fixation for spinal fractures: a biomechanical comparative study

Bio-mechanism Study of Heterogenetic Compact Spinal Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Spinal Fracture

Three Internal Fixations in Treating Spinal Burst Fracture with Bone Graft and Intact Longitudinal Ligament

[Construction and stability analysis of finite element model for spinal canal reconstruction with miniplates fixation]

Biomechanical comparison of three posterior fixation techniques for thoracolumbar burst fractures

Biomechanic Character and Anterior Reconstruction Significance Posterior to Internal Fixation of Various Extents of Anterior Median Spine Fractures of Thoracolumbar Vertebrae

Biomechanical analysis of the tandem spinal external fixation in a multiple-level noncontiguous lumbar fractures model: a finite element analysis

Biomechanical Comparison of Different Treatment Strategies for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture: A Finite Element Study

Biomechanical Evaluation of an Adaptive-Motion Pedicle Screw Fixation System: Experimental and Numerical Analysis

Biomechanical evaluation of monosegmental and bisegmental anterior fixation for thoracolumbar burst fracture]

Biomechanical Test of Interbody Bone Graft in Spinal Tuberculosis Constructed by Monosegment Fixation.

Three-dimensional finite element analysis on different implant fixation for L1 segment burst fracture