A Comparison of the Effectiveness of International Conflict Mediation Strategies

Qi Haixia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pom011
2007-01-01
Abstract:War and peace, cooperation and conflict, are recurring themes within the study of international relations, whose scholars constantly grapple with the problems of ameliorating disputes and lessening conflict. International mediation, among the various methods existent of resolving international conflict, is regarded as the most effective.1 This article compares the outcomes associated with various mediation strategies, and assesses the actual effectiveness of international mediation. International Mediation is, ‘a way of peacefully resolving international disputes which involves a third party's direct involvement in negotiations between the parties to the dispute, with the goal of encouraging the parties to make concessions, or through the use of diplomatic channels propose a plan for resolution of the conflict which the parties might take into consideration and ultimately adopt’.2 A general consensus as regards the effectiveness of international mediation in diffusing conflict emerged early in the history of IR studies.3 As, eminently, not all attempts at mediation are successful, the main question to be addressed is: what are the primary mechanisms that result in either successful or ineffective mediation?
What problem does this paper attempt to address?