Abstract:Despite some discomfort with this grandly philosophical topic, I do in fact hope to address a venerable pair of philosophical chestnuts: mathematical truth and existence. My plan is to set out three possible stands on these issues, for an exercise in compare and contrast. A word of warning, though, to philosophical purists (and perhaps of comfort to more mathematical readers): I will explore these philosophical positions with an eye to their interconnections with some concrete issues of set theoretic method. Let me begin with a brief look at what to count as ‘philosophy’. To some extent, this is a matter of usage, and mathematicians sometimes classify as ‘philosophical’ any considerations other than outright proofs. So, for example, discussions of the propriety of particular mathematical methods would fall under this heading: should we prefer analytic or synthetic approaches in geometry? Should elliptic functions be treated in terms of explicit representations (as in Weierstrass) or geometrically (as in Riemann)? Should we allow impredicative definitions? Should we restrict ourselves to a logic without bivalence or the law of the excluded middle? Also included in this category would be the trains of thought that shaped our central concepts: should a function always be defined by a formula? Should a group be required to have an inverse for every element? Should ideal divisors be defined contextually or explicitly, treated computationally or abstractly? In addition, there are more general questions concerning mathematical values, aims and goals: Should we strive for powerful theories or low-risk theories? How much stress should be placed on the fact or promise of physical applications? How important are interconnections between the various branches of mathematics? These philosophical questions of method naturally include several peculiar to set theory: should set theorists focus their efforts on drawing consequences for areas of interest to mathematicians outside mathematical logic? Should exploration of the standard axioms of ZFC be preferred to the exploration and exploitation of new axioms? How should axioms for set theory be chosen? What would a solution to the Continuum Problem look like?

Thinking about Some Mathematical Essence of Philosophy

Mathematical Character Between the Instrument and Culture: the Exploration of Mathematical Significance from the Concept of Patterned Mathematical Ontology

Mathematical Existence

Zero and Metaphysic- Thoughts about Being and Nothing from Mathematics,Buddhism, Daoism to Phenomenology

On the Empirical Nature of Mathematics

Analyzing the Existence of Mathematics from the Perspective of Information Philosophy

Mathematics Mechanization and Tao of Mathematics

The Peking Magazine and the communication of its mathematics

The roots of mathematical thought

What is Mathematics? Perspectives Inspired by Anthropology

The Simple research on Mathematic understanding from the perspect of socio-culture

On the Establishment of Integrating the Idea of Computer Mathematical Modeling into the Main Courses of Mathematics

On mathematics and knowledge

Epistemological Notes on Mathematics

How Do We Understand Mathematical Practices in Non-Mathematical Fields? Reflections Inspired by Cases from 12th and 13th Century China

Existence, Substantiality, and Counterfactuality Observations on the Status of Mathematics According to Aristotle, Euclid, and Others

Mathematics: abstraction and reality. A sketch toward deeper analysis

The Three State of Great Mathematic

Mathematics as an Exact and Precise Language of Nature

Metaphysics in Wei and Jin Dynasties and the Thought of Philosophers on Integrative Unity in the Discussion of the Relation Between Ens and Nonexistence Before That Time

The Evolution of Mathematical Thinking in Chinese Mathematics Education