Comparative Study of MRI Measurements of Children with and without Sensorineural Hearing Loss
YE Jianjun,JIANG Yanli,LUO Ying,CHEN Gang,HAN Yuedong,MA Qianghua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2012.11.003
2012-01-01
Abstract:Purpose To compare the cochlea of normal children and that of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) children by using MRI, and to establish the normal criteria. Materials and Methods Forty-seven children with severe SNHL were recruited in the study. 19 normal children were recruited as controls. All the structures and radial lines of inner ear were measured by MRI and compared between the two groups, and the relationship between different radial lines and different ages as well as genders were analyzed. Results The height of upper and posterior semicircular canal, and the vestibule vertical diameter of lateral and posterior semicircular canal were smaller of the children with SNHL than that of the control group (P<0.05). For the normal children, the height of upper, lateral and posterior semicircular canal were (5.25±0.50) mm, (3.38±0.55) mm and (5.16±0.73) mm, respectively. The diameter of upper, lateral and posterior semicircular canal were (0.91±0.13) mm, (0.93±0.21) mm and (1.09±0.22) mm, respectively. The cochlea height was (3.77±0.35) mm, the external diameter of cochlea basal turn was (6.88±0.52) mm, and the diameter of cochlea basal turn was (2.15±0.26) mm. No correlation between each line and age was observed. The study group showed statistical differences in the height of upper and posterior semicircular canal and diameter of cochlea basal turn between different genders (P<0.05); control group showed statistical differences in the height of upper, posterior, lateral semicircular canal, and diameter of lateral semicircular canal between different genders (P<0.05). Conclusion Height of the upper and posterior semicircular canal, and the vestibule vertical diameter of lateral and posterior semicircular canal of the children with SNHL are smaller than that of the control group. As being a noninvasive measurement with high tissue resolution, MRI is important in diagnosing sensorineural hearing loss.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?