Glutamine for traumatic brain injury: Meta analysis

DUAN Lei,ZENG Rong,TIAN Hong-liang,YANG Ke-hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-2725.2013.07.001
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness of glutamine for severe traumatic brain injury(TBI). Methods:The databases such as Pubmed(1966 to February 2012),Embase(1984 to February 2012),Cochrane Library(February 2012),CBM(1978 to February 2012),CNKI,VIP and Wanfang were electronically searched. Two reviewers independently screened the trials according to inclusion and exclusion criteria,extracted the data,and assessed the risk of bias. Meta-analyses were performed using the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.1 software. Results:Ten randomized controlled trials(RCTs) involving 492 participants with severe TBI were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that compared with control group,glutamine group could reduce the risk of pulmonary infection [RR= 0.40,95%CI(0.26,0.62),P<0.0001],hospital lengths of stay[SMD=-1.08,95%CI(-1.69,-0.48),P=0.0005],improve GCS scores SMD =0.73,95% CI(0.40,1.06),P <0.0001]and clinical effectiveness [RR =1.36,95% CI(1.07,1.72),P =0.01]. However,they have no differences in mortality rate [RR=0.56,95%CI(0.28,1.12),P=0.10]and diarrhea rate [RR=0.62,95%CI(0.36,1.08),P=0.09]. Conclusion:Supplement of glutamine could reduce pulmonary infection,hospital lengths of stay and improve GCS scores and clinical effectiveness. With RCTs of low methodology quality,trials in future should rigor generate random sequence and conceal allocation.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?