Abstract:Motivation Pricing decisions are often made when market information is still poor. While modern pricing analytics aid firms to infer the distribution of the stochastic demand that they are facing, data-driven price optimization methods are often impractical or incomplete if not coupled with testable theoretical predictions. In turn, existing theoretical models often reason about the response of optimal prices to changing market characteristics without exploiting all available information about the demand distribution. Academic/practical relevance Our aim is to develop a theory for the optimization and systematic comparison of prices between different instances of the same market under various forms of knowledge about the corresponding demand distributions. Methodology We revisit the classic problem of monopoly pricing under demand uncertainty in a vertical market with an upstream supplier and multiple forms of downstream competition between arbitrary symmetric retailers. In all cases, demand uncertainty falls to the supplier who acts first and sets a uniform price before the retailers observe the realized demand and place their orders. Results Our main methodological contribution is that we express the price elasticity of expected demand in terms of the mean residual demand (MRD) function of the demand distribution. This leads to a closed form characterization of the points of unitary elasticity that maximize the supplier’s profits and the derivation of a mild unimodality condition for the supplier’s objective function that generalizes the widely used increasing generalized failure rate (IGFR) condition. A direct implication is that optimal prices between different markets can be ordered if the markets can be stochastically ordered according to their MRD functions or equivalently, their elasticities. Using the above, we develop a systematic framework to compare optimal prices between different market instances via the rich theory of stochastic orders. This leads to comparative statics that challenge previously established economic insights about the effects of market size, demand transformations and demand variability on monopolistic prices. Managerial implications Our findings complement data-driven decisions regarding price optimization and provide a systematic framework useful for making theoretical predictions in advance of market movements.

Study on Measurement of Monopoly Power under Uncertainty

Market Power and the Measurement of Its Welfare Losses:A Review

The Optimization of Governmental Regulation Model under the Background of Uncertainty during Economic Transformation Period

Tariffs versus Quotas under Market Price Uncertainty

R&D Portfolio Risk Measurement and Its Application under Uncertainty

A Robust Optimization Model For Project Portfolio Selection With Information Uncertainty

Quantifying the Gap between Equilibrium and Optimum Under Monopolistic Competition

Monopoly pricing in vertical markets with demand uncertainty

Study on the Entry Game and Evaluation of Regulation Performance in a Monopoly Industry

Measuring Market Performance with Stochastic Demand: Price of Anarchy and Price of Uncertainty

Robust valuation and risk measurement under model uncertainty

A Disquisition on the Theory of Public Regulation and Anti-monopoly Based on Experimental Economics

Robust Quantitative Comparative Statics for a Multimarket Paradox

Counter-monotonic risk allocations and distortion risk measures

Robust Monopoly Regulation

Subjective Expected Utility Model and Empirical Analysis

A method of measuring the difference between probability models as uncertainty and its applications in financial economics

Study on Effect of Statutory Industrial Monopoly in China——Empirical Study from Welfare Loss and Welfare Distribution

Measuring Intangible Capital with Uncertainty

Distributionally robust portfolio maximization and marginal utility pricing in one period financial markets

Stochastic Monotonicity and Random Utility Models: The Good and The Ugly