Impact of Endoscopist's Experience on Success Rate of En-Bloc and En Bloc-Cure of Large Colorectal Polyps by Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Srinivas R. Puli,Yasuo Kakugawa,Takuji Gotoda,Jyotsna Bk Reddy,Daphne Antillon,Yutaka Saito,Mainor R. Antillon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2008.03.631

IF: 10.396

2008-01-01

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Abstract:Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has emerged as an alternative to surgery for the resection of large (> 2 cm) colorectal polyps. ESD is a technically demanding procedure. From published data, it is not clear how endoscopists' experience affects successful en-block resection of large colonic polyps. Aim: To evaluate how endoscopists experience in performing ESD affects the proportion of successful en-block resection of large colonic polyps. Method: Study Selection Criteria: Studies using ESD technique to resect large colonic polyps were selected. Successful cure en-block resection was defined as margins free polyp resection. Data collection & extraction: Articles were searched in Medline, Japanese language literature, and Cochrane control trial registry. Two reviewers independently searched and extracted data. Statistical Method: Summary estimates are expressed as pooled proportions. Studies were grouped into <100 ESD's performed and > 100 ESD's performed. First, the individual study proportions of successful resection are transformed into a quantity using Freeman-Tukey variant of the arcsine square root transformed proportion. The pooled proportion is calculated as the back-transform of the weighted mean of the transformed proportions, using inverse arcsine variance weights for the fixed effects model and DerSimonian-Laird weights for the random effects model. Results: Initial search identified 2,120 reference articles, in which, 389 relevant articles were selected and reviewed. Data was extracted from 13 studies (N = 1,080) which met the inclusion criteria. 9 Studies had <100 ESD's (N = 394) and 4 studies had >100 ESD's (N = 686). The mean size of the polyps was 30.65 ± SE 2.88 mm. The pooled proportions are shown in table 1. The fixed effect model was not used because of the heterogeneity among studies. The publication bias calculated by Begg-Mazumdar bias indicator for successful en-bloc resection gave a Kendall's tau b value of -0.22 (p = 0.32) and the same for successful cure en-block resection was -0.23 (p = 0.25). Conclusion: ESD is an innovative technique for resection of large colonic polyps that offers an alternative to surgery. Our meta-analysis shows that the success rate for both en-bloc and en-bloc cure improves with >100 ESDs. Endoscopist's experience significantly improves the success rates of this technique to treat large colorectal polyps. Tabled 1Pooled proportion using random effect model of successful en-block and cure en-block resection based on study size Study Size No of studies Successful En-bloc Resection Successful Cure En-bloc Resection < 100 Patients 9 82.60 % (95% CI = 66.45 to 94.22) 71.23 % (95% CI = 57.17 to 83.46) > 100 Patients 4 88.37 % (95% CI = 82.19 to 93.37) 82.25 % (95% CI = 71.56 to 90.85) Open table in a new tab