Abstract:Collective forests have long played an important economic, cultural and social role in the remote mountainous areas of China, especially before the Open and Reform Period. However, the centrist legal framework for managing and utilizing the collective forests was not sufficiently well developed to meet the demands of all community members, which led to largely unfettered overuse and illegal logging. This "tragedy of the commons" meant that the traditional human-forest connections that were so important in these areas gradually collapsed, to be replaced by self-interest. This situation informed a period of property rights reform in which steps were taken to introduce a form of legal pluralism that could improve both security of tenure and forest management. Using a study of Hongtian Village in Southern China, where forest tenure reform started, we argue that pluralist collective action is essential in order to identify grass-root solutions to the management of the forest commons. This involves the use rights for collective forests being separated from those of ownership, with the former distributed to households, according to their own, local, rules. While this new pluralist approach to forest tenure fostered renewed confidence in the potential for collective forestry to underpin community prosperity, the paper goes on to show how renewed top-down intervention, this time to promote a more ecological approach to forest management, has once again undermined the significance of people-forest relationships. We conclude by arguing that forests are very much at the frontier of property rights reform in China, because their effective governance depends utterly upon ensuring a plural approach to regulation that central authorities are currently unwilling to legitimate.

Collective Forest Management and Its Institution in China Rural Community

Collective land system in China: Congenital flaw or acquired irrational weakness?

Collective Participation in Conservation Easements in Rural China: Evidence from the Qianjiangyuan National Park

On the Issues of Rural Community Collective Main Body:An Analyzing on the Ownership of Rural Collective Land

Collective Forests and the Community at the Legal Frontier of Property Rights Reforms in China

Impact of Tenure Reform on Forest Management Model: the Case of Fujian province

Objective Regulation of Collective Land Ownership's Character

Collective Forest Tenure Reform:Assessment of Motivation,Characteristics and Performance

Collective Action in China’s Recent Collective Forestry Property Rights Reform

Collective Forest Tenure Reform in China:Analysis of Pattern and Performance

Usufruct of Forest in Continental Legal Family and Reform of Management Right of Forest in China

How can an alternative natural resource co-management system be established? —Evidence from Chinese community forestry

Collective Action In Maintaining Rural Infrastructures: Cadre-Farmer Relationship, Institution Rules And Their Interaction Terms

Comparative Analysis of Forest Conservation and Sustainable Forest Management in China and Germany

Reference and Verification on the Theory of Common-pool Resources Self-Governance-From Perspective of Research and Practice of Forest Management in China

Connotation and Architecture of Non-Commercial Forest Management in China

Building Institutions for Markets: Experiences and Lessons from China's Rural Forest Sector

On the Factors Influencing the Participatory Forest Management in Rural Communities in the West of China

How Do Farmers Realize Their Rights on the Collective Land in Rural China? An Explanatory Framework for Deconstructing the Subject of Collective Land Ownership

Market-driven Land Nationalization in China: A New System for the Capitalization of Rural Homesteads

The Wood Production Which is Oriented to the Forest Sustainable Management