Abstract:According to the Article 37of the Constitutional Law of PRC,the examination system of criminal arrest with Chinese characteristic,i.e.,the People's Procuratorate approves and decides criminal arrest in the period of investigation and the People's Court decides criminal arrest in the period of trial,is conformed,whose theoretical foundation is the theory of procuratorate supervision.From 1998,as regards the question who should have the power to decide criminal arrest,there are very hot and concentrated arguments among the communities of criminal law science and procurators.Such arguments are not accidental,but the legal reform problem deriving from China amending the constitutional law and forwarding the procedural justice. Quantitative analysis shows that arrest is applied widely in China,which violates the three constitutive requirements of detention stipulated by the Criminal Procedural Law,and has negative influence on fair trial and effective defense.Qualitative analysis demonstrates that the reason for the general application of detention is the People's Procuratorate enjoying the approval and decisive power over detention is a prosecutorial organ,and its substantive standard and ideology in prosecution,its intentional control over non-detention rate,and the deviation of detention function push away the applicable space of alternative measures of custody,such as posting a bail and awaiting for trial with stricted liberty of moving.It peels out the natural limitation of the theory of procuratorate supervision as well. In order to solve the problem of the general application of detention in China and guarantee personal freedom in a wide extent,we should establish a system of court examination based on the constitutional principle of "mutual check",which empower the court to conduct the power of decision over detention,that is,based on the initial examination by the procuratorate,to add an examination process by court so as to check with the investigative power of the procuratorate and the public security organ.The examination of detention by court is just the same as its hearing of public prosecution case.To conduct the uniform power over arrest by court enjoys constitutional and jurisprudential support in China.The reform is scientific,rational,pragmatic and feasible.

Progress of the Forensic Appraisal System in the New Criminal Procedural Law

Current status, obstacles and advice for improvement on expert assistant system

On the Examination and Determination of Forensic Appraisal Opinions

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

The Validity of Appraisal Conclusions as Evidence

Reform of the appraisal system of medical accidents

On the Criminal Compulsory Appraisal in China and Its Improvement

The Appointed Defense System in the New Criminal Procedure Law

Forensic Psychiatry in China

Chinese Forensic Psychiatry: History, Development and Challenges

[Informed Consent Right of the Appraised Individuals in Forensic Clinical Examination].

Retrospection and Reflection on the Criminal Judicial Reform in Recent Years

The Significant Reform of Criminal Evidence System and Its Extension

Nomological Analysis and Systematic Improvement of Judicatory Appraisers' Witnessing in Court

Thinking of the Reform of Forensic Medical Higher Education under the Current Circumstance

Field research report on the important problems of criminal evidence system

Analysis About The Institutional Change:Revision & Application Of China Criminal Law

Several Issues on the Reform of Criminal Procedure

Research on Hearing System in Reviewing Arrest

Field Research Report on Forensic Examination on Mental Disorder

Chinese Mode of Examination System of Arrest and Its Reform