Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease: Adrenergic Genetic Influence on Glomerular Filtration Rate Decline in Hypertensive Nephrosclerosis.

Yuqing Chen,Michael S. Lipkowitz,Rany M. Salem,Maple M. Fung,Vibha Bhatnagar,Manjula Mahata,Caroline M. Nievergelt,Fangwen Rao,Sushil K. Mahata,Nicholas J. Schork,Pamela J. Hicks,Donald W. Bowden,Barry I. Freedman,Victoria H. Brophy,Daniel T. O'Connor
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000313927
2010-01-01
American Journal of Nephrology
Abstract:Background: African-Americans are likely to develop hypertension and hypertensive nephrosclerosis. This grave prognosis, coupled with familial aggregation of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Blacks, prompts a search for genetic risk factors for ESRD. Recent evidence implicates a crucial role for the sympathetic nervous system in progressive renal disease. Methods: We used the African-American Study of Kidney Disease to probe whether β2-adrenergic receptor (ADRB2) predicts glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline rate. A total of 580 participants were included. Baseline GFR was 51.2 ± 0.5 ml/min/1.73 m2. Subjects were randomized in a 2 × 3 block design: to intensively lowered (MAP ≤92 mm Hg) versus ‘usual’ (MAP = 102–107 mm Hg) blood pressure goal groups, and also divided by three randomized antihypertensive drugs (ramipril, metoprolol, or amlodipine). We scored 4 SNPs at the ADRB2 locus. Results: Haplotypes at ADRB2 predicted chronic GFR decline rate, GFR declined more slowely in individuals with haplotype-1 (–804G→173T→16Gly→27GIn), and faster in those who carried haplotype-3 (–804G→173T→16Arg→27Gln). ADRB2 genotype interacted with antihypertensive drug class to influence GFR slope (p = 0.001–0.037). We extended our findings to an independent case/control sample of Black hypertensive ESRD, in which we found that variant Gly16Arg that tagged the GFR slope-determining ADRB2 haplotype also conferred risk for the ESRD trait in Blacks. Conclusions: The GFR decline/progression rate in hypertensive renal disease is controlled in part by genetic variation within the adrenergic pathway.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?