Abstract:BackgroundThe various endoscopic morphology of colorectal neoplasm represents different clinicopathological characteristics and clinical significance. Nevertheless the introduction of Paris classification system, the accuracy of morphological diagnosis using white light endoscopy (WLE) and image enhanced endoscopy (IEE) remains unclear.AimTo investigate the impact of IEE and short training program on the morphological diagnosis of colorectal neoplasm Material and Method: Thirty-three endoscopist from 7 Asia-Pacific countries participated in the testing before and after a short training program. Totally 84 video clips of 28 colorectal neoplasms using WLE, narrow band imaging (NBI), and chromoendoscopy (CE) observation was prepared for assessment. Correct rate of morphological diagnosis was assessed before and after training program. Correct answer was determined by expert panel. Comparison of correct rate among WLE, NBI and CE was made with Pearson Chi-square test and correct rate before and after training with each modality with McNemar test.ResultsFor polypoid lesions, the correct rate for morphological diagnosis with WLE, NBI, and CE was 91.4, 89.4, 93.9 % before and 96.5, 96 and 94.4% after training. No significant difference was observed after training and among different modalities. For non-polypoid lesions, the overall correct rate were 40.4, 50.2, and 55.9% before and 52.3, 58.5, and 64.7% after training. For some subcategories of non-polypoid lesions, significant improvement was observed after training and IEE had significantly higher correct rate than WLE regardless of training.ConclusionTabled 1Correct rate of endoscopic morphological diagnosis of colorectal neoplasm with variable endoscopic modalitiesBefore trainingAfter trainingOverall (%)WLE (%)NBI (%)CE (%)Overall (%)WLE (%)NBI (%)CE (%)All lesions5851.358.564.166.561.866.671.1Polypoid lesions91.691.489.493.995.696.596.094.4NP-CRN48.840.450.255.958.552.358.564.7All flat lesions47.041.448.051.558.254.556.164.10-IIa28.330.328.326.341.849.539.436.40-IIb62.660.663.663.662.657.663.666.7LST-G57.153.052.365.962.656.155.376.5LST-NG47.033.354.553.065.256.167.472.0All depressed lesions51.039.152.761.258.949.761.565.50-IIc, 0-IIa+IIc, or 0-IIc+IIa54.543.257.263.364.055.367.069.70-Is+IIc36.922.734.853.038.427.339.448.5NP-CRN: Non-polypoid colorectal neoplasm WLE: White light endoscopy NBI: Narrow band imaging CE: Chromoendoscopy Open table in a new tab BackgroundThe various endoscopic morphology of colorectal neoplasm represents different clinicopathological characteristics and clinical significance. Nevertheless the introduction of Paris classification system, the accuracy of morphological diagnosis using white light endoscopy (WLE) and image enhanced endoscopy (IEE) remains unclear. The various endoscopic morphology of colorectal neoplasm represents different clinicopathological characteristics and clinical significance. Nevertheless the introduction of Paris classification system, the accuracy of morphological diagnosis using white light endoscopy (WLE) and image enhanced endoscopy (IEE) remains unclear. AimTo investigate the impact of IEE and short training program on the morphological diagnosis of colorectal neoplasm Material and Method: Thirty-three endoscopist from 7 Asia-Pacific countries participated in the testing before and after a short training program. Totally 84 video clips of 28 colorectal neoplasms using WLE, narrow band imaging (NBI), and chromoendoscopy (CE) observation was prepared for assessment. Correct rate of morphological diagnosis was assessed before and after training program. Correct answer was determined by expert panel. Comparison of correct rate among WLE, NBI and CE was made with Pearson Chi-square test and correct rate before and after training with each modality with McNemar test. To investigate the impact of IEE and short training program on the morphological diagnosis of colorectal neoplasm Material and Method: Thirty-three endoscopist from 7 Asia-Pacific countries participated in the testing before and after a short training program. Totally 84 video clips of 28 colorectal neoplasms using WLE, narrow band imaging (NBI), and chromoendoscopy (CE) observation was prepared for assessment. Correct rate of morphological diagnosis was assessed before and after training program. Correct answer was determined by expert panel. Comparison of correct rate among WLE, NBI and CE was made with Pearson Chi-square test and correct rate before and after training with each modality with McNemar test. ResultsFor polypoid lesions, the correct rate for morphological diagnosis with WLE, NBI, and CE was 91.4, 89.4, 93.9 % before and 96.5, 96 and 94.4% after training. No significant difference was observed after training and among different modalities. For non-polypoid lesions, the overall correct rate were 40.4, 50.2, and 55.9% before and 52.3, 58.5, and 64.7% after training. For some subcategories of non-polypoid lesions, significant improvement was observed after training and IEE had significantly higher correct rate than WLE regardless of training. For polypoid lesions, the correct rate for morphological diagnosis with WLE, NBI, and CE was 91.4, 89.4, 93.9 % before and 96.5, 96 and 94.4% after training. No significant difference was observed after training and among different modalities. For non-polypoid lesions, the overall correct rate were 40.4, 50.2, and 55.9% before and 52.3, 58.5, and 64.7% after training. For some subcategories of non-polypoid lesions, significant improvement was observed after training and IEE had significantly higher correct rate than WLE regardless of training. ConclusionTabled 1Correct rate of endoscopic morphological diagnosis of colorectal neoplasm with variable endoscopic modalitiesBefore trainingAfter trainingOverall (%)WLE (%)NBI (%)CE (%)Overall (%)WLE (%)NBI (%)CE (%)All lesions5851.358.564.166.561.866.671.1Polypoid lesions91.691.489.493.995.696.596.094.4NP-CRN48.840.450.255.958.552.358.564.7All flat lesions47.041.448.051.558.254.556.164.10-IIa28.330.328.326.341.849.539.436.40-IIb62.660.663.663.662.657.663.666.7LST-G57.153.052.365.962.656.155.376.5LST-NG47.033.354.553.065.256.167.472.0All depressed lesions51.039.152.761.258.949.761.565.50-IIc, 0-IIa+IIc, or 0-IIc+IIa54.543.257.263.364.055.367.069.70-Is+IIc36.922.734.853.038.427.339.448.5NP-CRN: Non-polypoid colorectal neoplasm WLE: White light endoscopy NBI: Narrow band imaging CE: Chromoendoscopy Open table in a new tab NP-CRN: Non-polypoid colorectal neoplasm WLE: White light endoscopy NBI: Narrow band imaging CE: Chromoendoscopy

Tu1520 Implication of Image Enhanced Endoscopy and Short Training Program on the Morphological Diagnosis of Colorectal Neoplasm - an Asia-Pacific Multinational Study

Magnification endoscopy in combination with acetic acid enhancement and narrow-band imaging for the accurate diagnosis of colonic neoplasms

Narrow-Band Imaging and White-Light Endoscopy with Optical Magnification in the Diagnosis of Dysplasia in Barrett'S Esophagus: Results of the Asia-Pacific Barrett'S Consortium

Feasibility of Using Narrow Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic Classification for Diagnosing Colorectal Neoplasia in China: A Multicenter Pilot Observational Study.

Endoscopic characterization of small colonic polyps: baseline performance of experienced endoscopists is no different to that of medical students

A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia

Standard-definition White-light, High-definition White-light Versus Narrow-band Imaging Endoscopy for Detecting Colorectal Adenomas: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Classification and endoscopic diagnosis of colorectal polyps

New method for real-time visualization and quantitative characterization of early colorectal cancer in endoscopy: a pilot study

Narrow Band Imaging, Magnifying Chromoendoscopy, and Gross Morphological Features for the Optical Diagnosis of T1 Colorectal Cancer and Deep Submucosal Invasion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic Performance of Narrow-Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic and Japanese Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team Classification Systems for Colorectal Cancer and Precancerous Lesions.

Efficacy of Image-Enhanced Endoscopy for Colorectal Adenoma Detection: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial.

Endoscopic characterization of colorectal neoplasia with different published classifications: comparative study involving CONECCT classification

Improved visibility of colorectal tumor by texture and color enhancement imaging with indigo carmine

Linked color imaging improves colorectal lesion detection especially for low performance endoscopists: An international trial in Asia

[Comparison of Endoscopic Features Between Colorectal Sessile Serrated Adenoma/polyp with or Without Cytologic Dysplasia and Hyperplastic Polyp].

The value of three narrow-band imaging model in the diagnosis of small colorectal polyps

Diagnostic accuracy of magnification endoscopy with acetic acid enhancement and narrow-band imaging in gastric mucosal neoplasms

Assessment of Narrow-Band Imaging Algorithm for Video Capsule Endoscopy Based on Decorrelated Color Space for Esophageal Cancer: Part II, Detection and Classification of Esophageal Cancer

Efficacy of NICE Classification under Narrow-Band Imaging in Real-Time Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps

Recent Progress of Image-Enhanced Endoscopy for Upper Gastrointestinal Neoplasia and Associated Lesions