Prehypertension and black-white contrasts in cardiovascular risk in young adults: Bogalusa Heart Study.

Ahmet Toprak,Hongwei Wang,Wei Chen,Timir Paul,Litao Ruan,Sathanur Srinivasan,Gerald Berenson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e32831aeee3
IF: 4.9
2009-01-01
Journal of Hypertension
Abstract:Objective The aim of this study was to examine the association of prehypertension with measures of cardiovascular disease risk in a biracial (black-white) population of young adults. Methods As part of the Bogalusa Heart Study, echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography were performed along with cardiovascular risk factor measurements in 1379 young adult participants (age range 20-44 years, average 36 years; 43% men, 70% white). Participants were categorized as normotensives (60%), prehypertensives (27%) and hypertensives (13%). Results The prevalence of prehypertension was significantly higher among men than women (35 vs. 22%) and among blacks than whites (29 vs. 27%). Compared with normotensives, prehypertensives had a greater adverse cardiovascular risk factor profile. Male sex and BMI equally and significantly contributed to the prehypertension status in both whites [odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval 2.66 (1.88-3.74) and 1.10 (1.07-1.14)] and blacks [OR: 2.56 (1.51-4.33) and 1.05 (1.01-1.09)]. Additionally, prehypertensives compared with normotensives had significantly higher left ventricular (LV) mass index, LV internal diameter, and carotid artery intima-media thickness. Conclusion The condition of prehypertension in young adults shows men>women and black women>white women, and participants with prehypertension already have adverse profiles of risk factors and indices of subclinical cardiovascular disease. A greater percentage of blacks at a relatively young age fall into the hypertensive category. These findings underscore the need for aggressive management of cardiovascular risk in youth at levels below those considered as hypertension. J Hypertens 27: 243-250 (C) 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?