THE COMPARISON OF LONG-TERM OUTCOME BETWEEN LEFT HEPATECTOMY AND LEFT LATERAL SEGMENTECTOMY FOR LOCALIZED LEFT-SIDE INTRAHEPATIC LITHIASIS

李绍强,梁力建,彭宝岗,赖佳明
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1006-4761.2006.01.005
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the long-term outcome of left hepatectomy and left lateral segmentectomy for leftside intrahepatic lithiasis. Methods 96 patients with localized left-side intrahepatic lithiasis who underwent hepatectomy were reviewed retrospectively. 61 patietns were unergone left lateral segmentectomy (LLS), which was the L1S group. 35 patients were undergone left hepatectomy (LH), which was the LH group. The postoperative stone residual rate .complications and long-term outcome were compared between these two groups. Result the postoperative stone residual rate of the LLS group was significant higher than that of LH group (13. 1% vs 0%,P = 0. 025,Fisher exact test). Intraoperative bleeding (P = 0. 005),operative times (P = 0. 017)and hospital stays(P=0. 057) of the LH group was greater than those of the LLS group. There was no statistical significance of postoperative morbidity between these two groups(19. 7% vs 31. 4% ,P = 0. 220). The good satisfactory rate of LH group was significant better than that of LLS group(96. 8% vs 78. 8% ,P = 0. 027). Conclusion the long-term outcome of left hepatectomy is superior than that of left lateral segmentectomy for localized left-side intrahepatic lithiasis,and for these patients,left hepatectomy is indicated.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?