AN INDEX OF ACCESS TO CARE FOR INNER CITY CHILDREN WITH ASTHMA.† 639

H Mitchell,H Lynn,E Crain,C Kercsmar,K Weiss
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-199604001-00661
IF: 3.953
1996-01-01
Pediatric Research
Abstract:Poor access to care has been frequently mentioned as a possible cause for the rapid increase in asthma morbidity among children of the inner-city. For a sample of 1528 inner city children ages 4 to 9, the NCICAS project conducted an extensive assessment including more than 150 questions concerning health care access. This assessment included a wide range of access factors which could potentially be related to asthma morbidity. Using global measures, access to care appeared to be quite high with approximately 95% reporting that they had a usual place for attack and/or follow-up care. However, several specific elements of access were related to the children's asthma morbidity. Those access issues were; 1) having a place to call about the child's asthma problems; 2) finding it hard to get asthma attack care; 3) finding it hard to get follow-up care; 4) having to pay for medical costs; 5) having difficulty getting appointments for care. Responses to these five items were combined into an `access index' (AI) which was verified in a split sample canonical analysis. As expected, dividing the children into high and low AI groups revealed that those children with high access had fewer unscheduled and emergency room visits over a one year follow-up (p<.002); better over all functional status (p<.0001); fewer school days missed because of asthma(p<.0001), less wheeze (p<.01), less sleep loss (p<.02) and less reduction in play activities (p<.001) because of their asthma. Additionally, the AI show quite strong relationships for a rather broad range of other factors. Those scoring high on the AI showed less life stress on the PERI life events scale (6.77 vs. 8.77, p <.0001) and greater social support(p<.0001). The psychological adjustment of the child, as indicted by the Child Behavior Check List (CBCL), and the adjustment of the caretaker, as measured by the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) both revealed greater adjustment among those with high access (CBCL p <.0001, BSI p <.0001). The population studied by the NCICAS project includes a wide range of asthma severity. When these access issues are analyzed within severity strata, these dramatically strong access relationships were typically more pronounced among the severe children. The NCICAS Phase II intervention study which is currently underway will provide an opportunity to validate this measure and its morbidity relationship in a more direct, prospective design.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?