Clinical Implementation and Initial Experience of Online Adaptive Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
C. Peng,E. Ahunbay,S. Holmes,D. Wang,C. Lawton,X. Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.1729
2010-01-01
Abstract:Purpose/Objective(s)Interfraction organ deformation and rotation of the target and/or organs at risk (OAR) can be significant and cannot be completely accounted for by IGRT repositioning. We have previously developed and, recently, clinically implemented an online adaptive replanning technique to effectively address these interfraction variations in prostate cancer RT.Materials/MethodsThe online replanning process includes: (i) acquiring daily CT right before the treatment, (ii) generating contours of target and OARs based on the daily CT by auto-segmentation with manual editing if necessary, (iii) morphing segment apertures based on new contours, (iv) optimizing weights of the new apertures, (v) computing and comparing dose distributions and DVHs between the adaptive plan and the original plan with patient repositioning, (vi) transferring adaptive plan to delivery machine, (vii) verifying the adaptive plan with an independent MU calculation, and (viii) verifying beam data transferring using a software tool. The replanning process (ii-v) was implemented into a planning system (RealArt, Prowess) and was validated with phantom measurements and with retrospective dosimetric analyses for selected cases. This adaptive process has been recently applied prospectively for selected prostate cancer patients in our clinic using a CT-on-Rails (CTVision, Siemens). At the time when this abstract was written, the online adaptive process had been performed for eight patients at selected fractions.ResultsAdaptive plans based on the anatomy of the day for prostate RT can be generated within 7-10 min and can be ready for delivery within 12 min after the image acquisition. The plan quality (target coverage and/or OAR sparing) of an adaptive plan was generally better than or equal to that of the repositioning plan. The adaptive plan provides the planned target coverage with reduced doses to rectum and/or bladder (e.g., up to 40% or 75% reductions in rectal V38.2 (volume covered by 38.2 Gy) or V70, respectively), as compared to the repositioning plan. The online replanning process, eliminating the need to shift the patient, can be performed within the similar or slightly longer time frame required for the current IGRT repositioning, fits into the routine clinical workflow.ConclusionsThe newly developed online adaptive replanning technique can effectively account for interfraction variations including setup errors, organ motion and deformation within a practical timeframe, and has been successfully implemented in our clinic for online adaptive RT of prostate cancer. This online scheme enables “image-plan-treat”, a new paradigm for IGRT that permits shrinking PTV margins and can facilitate accurate RT delivery particularly important for hypofractionations (e.g., SBRT) and/or dose escalations. Purpose/Objective(s)Interfraction organ deformation and rotation of the target and/or organs at risk (OAR) can be significant and cannot be completely accounted for by IGRT repositioning. We have previously developed and, recently, clinically implemented an online adaptive replanning technique to effectively address these interfraction variations in prostate cancer RT. Interfraction organ deformation and rotation of the target and/or organs at risk (OAR) can be significant and cannot be completely accounted for by IGRT repositioning. We have previously developed and, recently, clinically implemented an online adaptive replanning technique to effectively address these interfraction variations in prostate cancer RT. Materials/MethodsThe online replanning process includes: (i) acquiring daily CT right before the treatment, (ii) generating contours of target and OARs based on the daily CT by auto-segmentation with manual editing if necessary, (iii) morphing segment apertures based on new contours, (iv) optimizing weights of the new apertures, (v) computing and comparing dose distributions and DVHs between the adaptive plan and the original plan with patient repositioning, (vi) transferring adaptive plan to delivery machine, (vii) verifying the adaptive plan with an independent MU calculation, and (viii) verifying beam data transferring using a software tool. The replanning process (ii-v) was implemented into a planning system (RealArt, Prowess) and was validated with phantom measurements and with retrospective dosimetric analyses for selected cases. This adaptive process has been recently applied prospectively for selected prostate cancer patients in our clinic using a CT-on-Rails (CTVision, Siemens). At the time when this abstract was written, the online adaptive process had been performed for eight patients at selected fractions. The online replanning process includes: (i) acquiring daily CT right before the treatment, (ii) generating contours of target and OARs based on the daily CT by auto-segmentation with manual editing if necessary, (iii) morphing segment apertures based on new contours, (iv) optimizing weights of the new apertures, (v) computing and comparing dose distributions and DVHs between the adaptive plan and the original plan with patient repositioning, (vi) transferring adaptive plan to delivery machine, (vii) verifying the adaptive plan with an independent MU calculation, and (viii) verifying beam data transferring using a software tool. The replanning process (ii-v) was implemented into a planning system (RealArt, Prowess) and was validated with phantom measurements and with retrospective dosimetric analyses for selected cases. This adaptive process has been recently applied prospectively for selected prostate cancer patients in our clinic using a CT-on-Rails (CTVision, Siemens). At the time when this abstract was written, the online adaptive process had been performed for eight patients at selected fractions. ResultsAdaptive plans based on the anatomy of the day for prostate RT can be generated within 7-10 min and can be ready for delivery within 12 min after the image acquisition. The plan quality (target coverage and/or OAR sparing) of an adaptive plan was generally better than or equal to that of the repositioning plan. The adaptive plan provides the planned target coverage with reduced doses to rectum and/or bladder (e.g., up to 40% or 75% reductions in rectal V38.2 (volume covered by 38.2 Gy) or V70, respectively), as compared to the repositioning plan. The online replanning process, eliminating the need to shift the patient, can be performed within the similar or slightly longer time frame required for the current IGRT repositioning, fits into the routine clinical workflow. Adaptive plans based on the anatomy of the day for prostate RT can be generated within 7-10 min and can be ready for delivery within 12 min after the image acquisition. The plan quality (target coverage and/or OAR sparing) of an adaptive plan was generally better than or equal to that of the repositioning plan. The adaptive plan provides the planned target coverage with reduced doses to rectum and/or bladder (e.g., up to 40% or 75% reductions in rectal V38.2 (volume covered by 38.2 Gy) or V70, respectively), as compared to the repositioning plan. The online replanning process, eliminating the need to shift the patient, can be performed within the similar or slightly longer time frame required for the current IGRT repositioning, fits into the routine clinical workflow. ConclusionsThe newly developed online adaptive replanning technique can effectively account for interfraction variations including setup errors, organ motion and deformation within a practical timeframe, and has been successfully implemented in our clinic for online adaptive RT of prostate cancer. This online scheme enables “image-plan-treat”, a new paradigm for IGRT that permits shrinking PTV margins and can facilitate accurate RT delivery particularly important for hypofractionations (e.g., SBRT) and/or dose escalations. The newly developed online adaptive replanning technique can effectively account for interfraction variations including setup errors, organ motion and deformation within a practical timeframe, and has been successfully implemented in our clinic for online adaptive RT of prostate cancer. This online scheme enables “image-plan-treat”, a new paradigm for IGRT that permits shrinking PTV margins and can facilitate accurate RT delivery particularly important for hypofractionations (e.g., SBRT) and/or dose escalations.