Abstract:Problem definition: Project outsourcing has been a pronounced trend in many industries but is also recognized as a major cause for project delays. We study how companies can coordinate outsourced projects with uncertain completion times through bilateral contract negotiations. Academic/practical relevance: Misaligned subcontractor incentives may result in substantial losses to both project clients and subcontractors. Coordinating subcontractors’ efforts through proper contracts is imperative to the success of project outsourcing. Most previous studies on project contracting have not addressed subcontractors’ bargaining powers or the dynamic bargaining process in negotiations. We fill in this gap by studying bilateral bargaining between the client and subcontractors, which better reflects real-world negotiations. Methodology: We model project contract negotiations as a multiunit bilateral bargaining game. We derive the conditions such that bilateral negotiations can achieve system coordination and characterize the equilibrium negotiation outcomes. We then compare the conditions and equilibria under various model settings to study their impact on project contracting. Results: Our study uncovers how the coordination of project outsourcing is impacted by the contract form, bargaining power structure, precedence network topology, payment timing, external opportunities, and negotiation protocols. For single-task projects, the widely used fixed-price (cost-plus) contract can achieve system coordination only when the subcontractor (client) possesses full bargaining power. Cost-sharing and time-based incentive contracts, which perform well for single-task projects, may not be effective for projects with parallel tasks when any subcontractor’s bargaining power is sufficiently high. Projects with serial tasks can be coordinated only under certain extreme bargaining power structures. Delaying payments always exacerbates the incentive misalignment. Managerial implications: Our analysis provides insights and guidelines to companies regarding how to select proper contract forms and payment timing schemes, based on the characteristics of the projects and subcontractors, to ensure the effectiveness of project outsourcing. Our results also highlight the importance of bargaining modeling in project contracting.

Research on TPL Subcontract Model Based on Cooperation Mechanism

Supply Chain Coordination Involving Retailer with Flexible Objectives

On the Coordinated Supply Chain Mechanism Based on Third-party Logistics Enterprises

Process Model and Operational Pattern of Strategic Purchasing

An analysis of supply chain game model with a third party logistics service provider involved

Research On Collaboration Strategy Of Logistics Based On Resource And Activity

Research on Logistics Network Model Based on Performance Collaboration

Strategy study on collaborative logistics

Sub-Coordination in a Competing Supply Chain with a 3PL Provider

Model and Simulation of Benefit Distribution of Collaborative Cooperation in the Supply Chain of General Contracting Projects

Research on Coordination Strategy of Two-level Supply Chain with the Logistic Service Provider Involved

Coordination mechanism in service supply chains with wholesale price contracts

Growth Mechanism of Subcontracting Enterprises Based on Project Knowledge Management

Synergic Production Process Controlling in Supply Chain Management

A supply chain coordination mechanism with suppliers’ effort performance level and fairness concern

Research on Buy-Back Contract for Supply Chain Coordination with Prospect Theory

Coopetitive Supply Chain Relationship Model: Application to the Smartphone Manufacturing Network

Research on collaborative model of supply chain logistics providers towards intelligent manufacturing

Cooperative Suppliers Cournot Models In Supply Chain With Arbitrage

Managing channel profits of different cooperative models in closed-loop supply chains

Coordinating Project Outsourcing Through Bilateral Contract Negotiations