Transabdominal sonographic sliding signs for preoperative prediction of dense intra‐abdominal adhesions in women undergoing repeat Cesarean delivery
M. Mayibenye,G. A. B. Buga,M. L. Mdaka,M. K. Nanjoh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29133
2024-11-14
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Abstract:Objectives To assess the accuracy and utility of transabdominal sonographic paraumbilical and suprapubic sliding signs in predicting intra‐abdominal adhesions in women undergoing repeat Cesarean section (CS) and the association of repeat CS with short‐term maternal and neonatal outcomes. Methods This was a prospective observational study of pregnant women with a history of CS who were scheduled for third‐trimester elective or emergency CS at a tertiary referral and teaching hospital between July 2021 and June 2022. In order to evaluate the role of transabdominal sonographic paraumbilical and suprapubic sliding signs in the prediction of intra‐abdominal adhesions, participants underwent a high‐resolution transabdominal ultrasound scan prior to repeat CS. Free cephalad and caudad gliding of the uterus under the abdominal wall during deep inhalation and exhalation in each area was considered a positive sliding sign, suggesting a low risk of intra‐abdominal adhesions. The absence of such movement was considered a negative sliding sign, suggesting a high risk of intra‐abdominal adhesions. The presence or absence of intra‐abdominal adhesions was then confirmed during surgery by physicians who were blinded to the sonographic sliding‐sign findings. The type of adhesion, structures involved, method of adhesiolysis, incision‐to‐delivery time, 1‐min and 5‐min Apgar scores, maternal and neonatal injury and other short‐term complications were also reported. Results Of 419 women with a history of at least one previous CS who underwent repeat CS, the preoperative sonographic paraumbilical and suprapubic sliding signs were negative in 173 (41.3%) and 178 (42.5%) women, respectively. On repeat CS, 224 (53.5%) women had intra‐abdominal adhesions, of which 165 (39.4%) had dense adhesions and 59 (14.1%) had only filmy adhesions. The sensitivity and specificity of a negative preoperative paraumbilical sliding sign in predicting the presence of dense intra‐abdominal adhesions in women undergoing repeat CS were 94.6% (95% CI, 92.4–96.7%) and 93.3% (95% CI, 90.9–95.7%), respectively. A negative suprapubic sliding sign also showed high sensitivity (95.2% (95% CI, 93.1–97.2%)) and specificity (91.7% (95% CI, 89.1–94.4%)). Additionally, a negative sliding sign at both locations in the same patient had robust sensitivity (90.2% (95% CI, 87.3–93.0%)) and specificity (96.3% (95% CI, 94.5–98.1%)). We found that the risk of dense intra‐abdominal adhesions increased with parity and the number of previous CS. Dense intra‐abdominal adhesions were associated with increased incision‐to‐delivery time, higher risk of maternal bladder injury, intraoperative bleeding and postpartum hemorrhage. Conclusions Dense intra‐abdominal adhesions are common in women with a previous history of CS and are associated with delayed delivery of the neonate and increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes. The transabdominal sonographic paraumbilical and suprapubic sliding signs are robust methods for the accurate preoperative prediction of dense intra‐abdominal adhesions in patients with a history of CS. As the techniques are easy to learn and perform, the sliding sign should be used more widely for triaging patients at high risk of dense intra‐abdominal adhesions for appropriate preoperative planning. © 2024 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics