Abstract:Government-sponsored job-training programs must be subject to evaluation to assess whether their effectiveness justifies their cost to the public. The evaluation usually focuses on employment and total earnings, although the effect on wages is also of interest, because this effect reflects the increase in human capital due to the training program, whereas the effect on total earnings may be simply reflecting the increased likelihood of employment without any effect on wage rates. Estimating the effects of training programs on wages is complicated by the fact that, even in a randomized experiment, wages are "truncated" (or less accurately "censored") by nonemployment, that is, they are only observed and well-defined for individuals who are employed. In this article, we develop a likelihood-based approach to estimate the wage effect of the US federally-funded Job Corps training program using "Principal Stratification". Our estimands are formulated in terms of: (1) the effect of the training program on wages for those who would be employed whether they were trained or not, also called the survivor average causal effect (SACE), and the proportion of people in this category; (2) the wages when trained for those who would be employed only when trained, and the proportion of people in this category; (3) the wages when not trained for those who would be employed only when not trained, and the proportion of people in this category; (4) the proportion of people who would be not employed whether trained or not. We conduct likelihood-based analysis using the EM algorithm, and investigate the plausibility of important submodels with scaled log-likelihood ratio statistics. We also conduct a sensitivity analysis with respect to specific parametric assumptions. Our results suggest that all four types of people [(1)-(4) previously] exist, which is impossible under the usual monotonicity assumptions made in traditional econometric evaluation methods.

Evaluating The Effects Of Job Training Programs On Wages Through Principal Stratification

Evaluating the effects of job training programs on wages through principal stratification

Likelihood-Based Analysis of Causal Effects of Job-Training Programs Using Principal Stratification

Evaluating the effect of training on wages in the presence of noncompliance, nonemployment, and missing outcome data

Assessing Causal Effects in a Longitudinal Observational Study With “Truncated” Outcomes Due to Unemployment and Nonignorable Missing Data

Analysis of Broken Randomized Experiments by Principal Stratification

The effects of training incidence and planned training duration on labor market transitions

Do Individual Programme Effects Exceed the Costs? Norwegian Evidence on Long Run Effects of Labour Market Training

Continuous training and wages: An empirical analysis using a comparison-group approach

Peer Effects in Labor Market Training

Heterogeneous Employment Effects of Job Search Programmes: A Machine Learning Approach

GEEPERs: Principal Stratification using Principal Scores and Stacked Estimating Equations

Heterogeneous Earnings Effects of the Job Corps by Gender Earnings: A Translated Quantile Approach

Labor Outcomes After Employer‐Provided Training: Evidence from the Understanding Society Survey

Estimating treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized program evaluation

Priority to unemployed immigrants? A causal machine learning evaluation of training in Belgium

Principal stratification with continuous treatments and continuous post-treatment variables

Bayesian Framework for Causal Inference with Principal Stratification and Clusters

An application of principal stratification to control for institutionalization at follow-up in studies of substance abuse treatment programs