Abstract:Genetic engineering is an important tool in plant functional genomics research and crop improvement applications.During the production of transgenic plants,the regenerated plantlets(T0) through transformation process will often mix with false-positive plants.In addition,the propagation of T0 plants will generate a certain percentage of non-transgenic progenies through the median-segregation of the transgene.Rapid identification of the transformed transgenic plants from the non-transgenic plants is an essential step in the production of transgenic plants.The commonly used method for identifying the existence of transgene in plants is through the polymerase chain reaction(PCR),which uses a pair of the target gene-specific primers to amplify the target DNA fragment from the genomic DNA samples of the tested plants.The use of PCR methods in transgenic plant screening is prone to cross contamination,is time consuming,and is considerably expensive.Thus,the development of methods for identifying transgenic plants in a robust,precise manner is of great importance.In this study,we assessed different methods for identifying rapidly and precisely transgenic rice and soybean plants containing herbicide resistant genes,including phosphinothricin acetyl transferase gene(bar) and modified 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase gene(EPSPS).The methods used for the research included leaf-painting of herbicides,leaf-incubation on the solid medium containing herbicides,and seed germination in presence of herbicides.For these experiments optimum concentrations of herbicides were determined.Results showed that all tested methods could be used for rapid screening of transgenic plants.Application of 300 mg/L Liberty? could easily distinguish the bar-containing rice plants from the non-transgenic ones(Fig.1),while Liberty? at 135 mg/L was sufficient for the identification of transgenic soybean plants(Fig.2).Similarly,EPSPS-containing rice and soybean plants were determined by leaf-painting of 1 % and 0.25 % roundup(active gradient of glyphosate was 41 %),respectively(Fig.3,4).Solid medium with 50 mg/L glyphosate was suitable to distinguish leaf samples of soybean plants containing EPSPS gene(Fig.5).Seed germination was very sensitive to selective agents.The germination of the non-transgenic seeds was completely prohibited in water solution containing either of the herbicides at the concentration of 10 mg/L(Fig.6-9).In conclusion,we establish three methods that can rapidly and precisely identify transgenic rice and soybean plants containing herbicide-resistant gene bar and EPSPS.Our results can be used in both transgenic research and safety assessment of transgenic crop production.

Analysis of Phenolic Substances in Transgenic Soybean Seeds and Other Soybean Varieties

Monitoring and traceability of genetically modified soya bean event GTS 40-3-2 during soya bean protein concentrate and isolate preparation

Effects of Sulfur-rich Amino Acids Transgenic Soybeans on Soil Organic Elements and Microbial Community Diversity

The Effects of Commercial Glyphosate Herbicide on the Seedlings of Transgenic Cotton with Glyphosate Resistance

Phytochemical profiling of soybean genotypes using GC-MS and UHPLC-DAD/MS

Impact of a G2-EPSPS & GAT Dual Transgenic Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean Line on the Soil Microbial Community under Field Conditions Affected by Glyphosate Application

Genetic Analysis of Transgenic Glyphosate-resistance Cotton with EPSPS Gene

Identification of Genomic Insertion and Flanking Sequence of G2-EPSPS and GAT Transgenes in Soybean Using Whole Genome Sequencing Method

Establishment of Methods for Identifying Rapidly and Precisely Transgenic Rice and Soybean Containing Herbicide-Resistant Gene Bar and EPSPS

Gene Analysis of Genetically Modified Soybean Lectin Based on Fluorescence Quantitative PCR

Real-time polymerase chain reaction monitoring of recombinant DNA entry into soil from decomposing roundup ready leaf biomass

Plant characterization of insect-protected soybean

Analysis of the Unintended Effects of the Bacillus thuringiensis Insecticidal Protein in Genetically Modified Rice Using Untargeted Transcriptomics

Comparison of Compositions of Imported Genetically Modified and Organic Soybeans Purchased from Taiwan Market

Comparative transcriptome analysis during seeds development between two soybean cultivars

Discrepancies in Rhizobacterial Assembly Caused by Glyphosate Application and Herbicide-Tolerant Soybean Co-expressing GAT and EPSPS.

Differential Assembly and Shifts of the Rhizosphere Bacterial Community by a Dual Transgenic Glyphosate-Tolerant Soybean Line with and without Glyphosate Application

Assessment of genetically modified soybean GMB151 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2018‐153)

Assessment of genetically modified soybean SYHT0H2 for food and feed uses, import and processing, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA‐GMO‐DE‐2012‐111)

Using transcriptomic and metabolomic data to investigate the molecular mechanisms that determine protein and oil contents during seed development in soybean

Simultaneous Analysis and Dietary Exposure Risk Assessment of Fomesafen, Clomazone, Clethodim and Its Two Metabolites in Soybean Ecosystem