Accounting and Analyzing Material Metabolism in the Economic System of Liaoning Province
XU Ming,JIA Xiao-ping,SHI Lei,ZHANG Tian-zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1007-7588.2006.05.020
2006-01-01
Abstract:Studying the quantity and quality of material metabolism in the socioeconomic system,which is regarded as a sub-system of natural ecology system,is now the outstanding emphasis of Industrial Ecology research.Such research done in China mainly concentrated on national economic system.More detailed analysis on its sub-area,such as a province,is a useful way to expand the research works of material metabolism and Industrial Ecology,and is also helpful to the sub-area's sustainable development.Based on the Accounting and Analysis(MFA) method of Material Flow applied in western countries,the Liaoning Province in China was chosen as study area.The research can be regarded as the first attempt for studying the material metabolism at province level in China,and it also promotes the research works of material metabolism and Industrial Ecology in China.Considering the limitation of data of material import and export,a set of new indicators is developed to illustrate the natural resources consumption in Liaoning Province.The study calculates the material indicators of Liaoning from 1990 to 2003,from the input and output perspectives.These indicators are then connected with economic and demographic indicators to create new indicators,which scale the material intensity and efficiency of Liaoning's economy.The results showed that the changing process of material metabolism in Liaoning is similar with that of China in the same period.The changing process can be divided into three phases,which are highly consistent with the Eighth,Ninth,and Tenth Five-Year Plans implemented by Chinese government.It can also be seen as the obvious evidence that material metabolism of an economics system is greatly influenced by the macro-policy.The absolute amount of material metabolism in Liaoning is high, and the relative number is also higher than the average level of the whole China.However,the quantitative advantage of material metabolism did not lead to high economic return.Liaoning's physical productive efficiency is not only lower than the average level of whole China,but also extremely lower than the advanced level of developed countries.For instance,Liaoning's GDP generated by unit input of natural resources in 2003 is roughly equal to 30% of the average level of 15 main countries in European Union in 2000 and 10% of the average level of Japan in 1996.High quantity of natural resources consumption in Liaoning doesn't bring high quality of return.