Abstract:Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of 1 aparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy (LaHt)in the treatment of liver cancer by comparing with Open precise hepatectomy (OHt).Methods Forty-six cases of liver tumor hepatectomy were collected by the none randomized controlled trails (non-RCTs) from January 2011 to December 2013 in Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery,Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital.According to the operation method,they were divided into two groups,including 19 cases of LaHt group and 27 cases of OHt group.Compare differences of their operation time,intraoperative blood loss,time of Pringle maneuver,and postoperative hospital stay,time of postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery,Serum liver function index,pathological tumor margin,postoperative complications,total hospitalization expenditures.Results (1) No perioperative mortality was observed in the 2 groups.(2) Compared with OHt group,LaHt group had shorter Pringle maneuver time with statistical significance (P ＜ 0.05,F =8.662) ; while,LaHt group also had less hemorrhage and shorter operation time than OHt group,although statistical significance did not existed (P ＞ 0.05,F =1.481,F =0.539).(3) Compare with OHt group,postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery of LaHt group was faster while postoperative length of hospital stay of LaHt group was shorter with obviously statistical significances existed (P ＜ 0.01,F =7.691,F =11.408).(4) The liver function index serum ALT,AST of LaHt group is lower compared to that of OHtgroup postoperative dayl and 3,however,only the day 3 AST had statistical significance (P ＜ 0.05,F =4.226).LaHt group had lower CRP level than OHt group on both day 1 and 3 after surgery,but there was no statistical significance(P ＞ 0.05,F =0.792,F =0.007).Serum TB and DB varied little between LaHt and OHt group on both day 1 and 3 after surgery without statistical significance (P ＞ 0.05,F =2.002,F =0.021,F =0.442,F =1.392).(5) The average hospital charges for the patients in LaHt group is higher than that in OH group,but there was still no statistical significance (P ＞ 0.05,F =0.046).(6) Although there was no significant difference between LaHt and OH in positive/negative excision margin ratio (P ＞0.05,x2 =1.453),there was 1 case of excision margin residues in LaHt group which would have negative effects on the prognoses.Conclusions Laparoscopic hepatectomy is a safe and feasible surgical approach,with minimally invasive advantage for treatment of liver cancer.However,compared with open precise hepatectomy,there are still some deficiencies in terms of radical curative aspect.

A comparative study of anterior versus conventional approach for left lateral lobectomy in patients with complicated liver spaceoccupying lesions

Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of High-Quality Case-Matched Studies

Perioperative Outcomes Comparing Laparoscopic with Open Repeat Liver Resection for Post-Hepatectomy Recurrent Liver Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Laparoscopic Right Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis of Outcomes Compared with Conventional Open Surgery.

Laparoscopic Versus Open Major Hepatectomy For Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

Total Laparoscopic Right Hemihepatectomy Through Anterior Approach for Larger Tumors in the Right Lobe of the Liver

Totally laparoscopic ALPPS for primary liver cancer complicated with cirrhosis----application of ;round-the-liver ligation to replace parenchymal transection

[The Strategy of Isolated Complete Resection of the Caudate Lobe of the Liver Through the Anterior Liver-Splitting Approach: a Report of 19 Cases].

Comparision of laparoscopic and open left lobectomy: a prospective controlled study

Anterior approach with or without liver hanging maneuver versus conventional approach in major liver resections. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Comparison of Long-Term Clinical Efficacy of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Between Video-Assisted Minithoracotomy and Open Lobectomy

Anterior Approach for Complete Resection of Liver Caudate Lobe

Application of the Left Lateral Decubitus Position in Laparoscopic Right Posterior Lobectomy

Laparoscopic Versus Open Left Lateral Segmentectomy for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Open versus laparoscopic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Under the Guidance of the Concept of Precise Anatomical Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Long-term and short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: might laparoscopic approach be better in early HCC?

Comparing laparoscopic versus laparotomy in treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases

Comparative study on left-sided versus right-sided hepatectomy for resectable peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The comparative analysis of clinical curative effect of laparoscopic hepatectomy and open resection for hepatic tumor

Caudate lobe-based minimally invasive anatomic hepatectomy: a retrospective study