Planckearly Results. IX.XMM-Newtonfollow-up for Validation Ofplanckcluster Candidates

N. Aghanim,M. Arnaud,M. Ashdown,J. Aumont,C. Baccigalupi,A. Balbi,A. J. Banday,R. B. Barreiro,M. Bartelmann,J. G. Bartlett,E. Battaner,K. Benabed,A. Benoit,J-P Bernard,M. Bersanelli,R. Bhatia,J. J. Bock,A. Bonaldi,J. R. Bond,J. Borrill,F. R. Bouchet,M. L. Brown,M. Bucher,C. Burigana,P. Cabella,C. M. Cantalupo,J-F Cardoso,P. Carvalho,A. Catalano,L. Cayon,A. Challinor,A. Chamballu,L-Y Chiang,G. Chon,P. R. Christensen,E. Churazov,D. L. Clements,S. Colafrancesco,S. Colombi,F. Couchot,A. Coulais,B. P. Crill,F. Cuttaia,A. Da Silva,H. Dahle,L. Danese,P. de Bernardis,G. de Gasperis,A. de Rosa,G. de Zotti,J. Delabrouille,J-M Delouis,F-X Desert,J. M. Diego,K. Dolag,S. Donzelli,O. Dore,U. Doerl,M. Douspis,X. Dupac,G. Efstathiou,T. A. Ensslin,F. Finelli,I. Flores-Cacho,O. Forni,M. Frailis,E. Franceschi,S. Fromenteau,S. Galeotta,K. Ganga,R. T. Genova-Santos,M. Giard,G. Giardino,Y. Giraud-Heraud,J. Gonzalez-Nuevo,R. Gonzalez-Riestra,K. M. Gorski,S. Gratton,A. Gregorio,A. Gruppuso,D. Harrison,P. Heinamaki,S. Henrot-Versille,C. Hernandez-Monteagudo,D. Herranz,S. R. Hildebrandt,E. Hivon,M. Hobson,W. A. Holmes,W. Hovest,R. J. Hoyland,K. M. Huffenberger,G. Hurier,A. H. Jaffe,M. Juvela,E. Keihanen,R. Keskitalo,T. S. Kisner,R. Kneissl,L. Knox,H. Kurki-Suonio,G. Lagache,J-M Lamarre,A. Lasenby,R. J. Laureijs,C. R. Lawrence,M. Le Jeune,S. Leach,R. Leonardi,A. Liddle,M. Linden-Vornle,M. Lopez-Caniego,P. M. Lubin,J. F. Macias-Perez,B. Maffei,D. Maino,N. Mandolesi,R. Mann,M. Maris,F. Marleau,E. Martinez-Gonzalez,S. Masi,S. Matarrese,F. Matthai,P. Mazzotta,A. Melchiorri,J-B Melin,L. Mendes,A. Mennella,S. Mitra,M-A Miville-Deschenes,A. Moneti,L. Montier,G. Morgante,D. Mortlock,D. Munshi,A. Murphy,P. Naselsky,P. Natoli,C. B. Netterfield,H. U. Norgaard-Nielsen,F. Noviello,D. Novikov,I. Novikov,S. Osborne,F. Pajot,F. Pasian,G. Patanchon,O. Perdereau,L. Perotto,F. Perrotta,F. Piacentini,M. Piat,E. Pierpaoli,R. Piffaretti,S. Plaszczynski,E. Pointecouteau,G. Polenta,N. Ponthieu,T. Poutanen,G. W. Pratt,G. Prezeau,S. Prunet,J-L Puget,R. Rebolo,M. Reinecke,C. Renault,S. Ricciardi,T. Riller,I. Ristorcelli,G. Rocha,C. Rosset,J. A. Rubino-Martin,B. Rusholme,E. Saar,M. Sandri,D. Santos,B. M. Schaefer,D. Scott,M. D. Seiffert,G. F. Smoot,J-L Starck,F. Stivoli,V. Stolyarov,R. Sunyaev,J-F Sygnet,J. A. Tauber,L. Terenzi,L. Toffolatti,M. Tomasi,J-P Torre,M. Tristram,J. Tuovinen,L. Valenziano,L. Vibert,P. Vielva,F. Villa,N. Vittorio,B. D. Wandelt,S. D. M. White,D. Yvon,A. Zacchei,A. Zonca
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201116460
2011-01-01
Abstract:We present the XMM-Newton follow-up for confirmation of Planck cluster candidates. Twenty-five candidates have been observed to date using snapshot (∼10 ks) exposures, ten as part of a pilot programme to sample a low range of signal-to-noise ratios (4 5 candidates. The sensitivity and spatial resolution of XMM-Newton allows unambiguous discrimination between clusters and false candidates. The 4 false candidates have S/N ≤ 4.1. A total of 21 candidates are confirmed as extended X-ray sources. Seventeen are single clusters, the majority of which are found to have highly irregular and disturbed morphologies (about ∼70%). The remaining four sources are multiple systems, including the unexpected discovery of a supercluster at z = 0.45. For 20 sources we are able to derive a redshift estimate from the X-ray Fe K line (albeit of variable quality). The new clusters span the redshift range 0.09 < z < 0.54, with a median redshift of z ∼ 0.37. A first determination is made of their X-ray properties including the characteristic size, which is used to improve the estimate of the SZ Compton parameter, Y500. The follow-up validation programme has helped to optimise the Planck candidate selection process. It has also provided a preview of the X-ray properties of these newly-discovered clusters, allowing comparison with their SZ properties, and to the X-ray and SZ properties of known clusters observed in the Planck survey. Our results suggest that Planck may have started to reveal a non-negligible population of massive dynamically perturbed objects that is under-represented in X-ray surveys. However, despite their particular properties, these new clusters appear to follow the Y500–YX relation established for X-ray selected objects, where YX is the product of the gas mass and temperature.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?