An ideal model of atrial flutter in the rabbit

Gang XU,Yan-Hong YANG,Jing-An WANG,Guang-Ping LI

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-5410.2006.03.002

2006-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the vulnerability to atrial tachycardia between the rabbit and the dog and establish an ideal atrial tachycardia model. Methods 20 adult New Zealand white rabbits were devided into pating group and control group. For the pacing group(n=11) rapid atrial pacing(RAP) at a frequency of 10Hz was given for 2 hours to establish electrical remodeling, while the control group(n=9) just got false operation. Then the heart was isolated and a Langendorff-perfused model was established. Standard electrophysiology study was underwent at both atrium to observe the inducibility of atrial arrhythmias. 18 mongrel dogs were anesthetized and the hearts were exposed by intersternal ectomy. Standard electrophysiology study were performed at atrium before and after RAP(10Hz) fo 2 hours from both appendage to observe the inducibility of atrial arrhythmias. Results (1) In both of the rabbit and the dog, the inducibility of atrial fibrillation(Af) was increased significantly by RAP fo 2 hours The duration of the induced Af was significantly longer in dog than in rabbit. (2) The persistent atrial flutter(AF) was easily induced in both of the group of RAP and control in the rabbits (7/11 vs 5/9, P=1.000). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the duration of AF[(39.8±54.4 )Sec vs (70.7±62.2) Sec,P=0.381]. AF could not be induced in the dogs. (3) All of the AF in the rabbits can be induced by a single premature stimulus or by S1S1 pacing and can be ceased by overdrive pacing. Conclusion It was easier to establish Af model in dog than in rabbit. New Zealand white rabbit may be more suitable to establish AF model.