Abstract:(i) Objective: Changes in the mesiodistal axial angulations of teeth with orthodontic treatment have been a topic of interest in orthodontics for many years, although it has not been clarified enough yet. Therefore, this present study aimed to compare mesiodistal axial angulations of canine and first molar teeth by measuring from pre- and post-treatment panoramic radiographs in different types of orthodontic malocclusions. (ii) Materials and Methods: In the study, the mesiodistal axial angulation angles of the lower–upper canines (teeth numbered 13, 23, 33, and 43) and first molars (teeth numbered 16, 26, 36, and 46) were compared on panoramic radiographs taken pre- (T0) and post- (T1) orthodontic treatment of 353 patients: 237 female (mean age 14.74 ± 2.96) and 116 male (mean age 14.44 ± 2.50), who had not received any prior orthodontic treatment. The groups were formed according to pre-/post-treatment, gender, angle classification, skeletal classification, bilaterally first premolar extraction/non-extraction, and the use/non-use of miniscrews in the extraction cases. The mesiodistal angulations between the long axes of both the lower and upper canines and first molars and the interorbital plane were measured separately and recorded. The reliability analysis between the repeated measurements was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). For statistical analysis, a paired sample t-test and Wilcoxon test were used for the normally and non-normally distributed data, respectively. For the between-groups comparison, independent sample t-test and one-way ANOVA were used for normally distributed data, while the Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used for non-normally distributed data. A value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. (iii) Results: ICCs showed excellent reliability, ranging from 0.804 to 0.913 in other teeth, yet were good in tooth 43 (ICC = 0.712). Regardless of the groups, statistically significant differences were found between the T0 and T1 angulations for all teeth, except teeth 13 and 16. In all groups, the increase in the angulations of teeth 33 and 43 and the decrease in the angulations of teeth 36 and 46 (except skeletal class 3) were found to be statistically significant. The T0 and T1 angulation changes in the miniscrews in the used and non-used groups in extraction cases were similar to the differences found in all teeth, regardless of the groups. There was no significant difference between gender, skeletal classes, and angle classes in the amounts of change in the mesiodistal angulations. (iv) Conclusion: It was concluded that orthodontic treatment caused significant changes in the mesiodistal axial angulation of the canine and the first molar teeth. Furthermore, the fact that the angulations tended to increase in the lower canine teeth and decrease in the lower first molar teeth revealed the importance of tooth movement control, especially in orthodontic mechanics in the mandibula.

Comparison of Intermaxillary Tooth Size Discrepancies Between Angle Class II Malocclusion of Different Molar Relationship

Comparison of the Bolton index and Bolton tooth size discrepancies between Class II1 and II2 malocclusion

Comparison of the tooth width and Bolton index between Angle class Ⅱ1 and Ⅱ2 malocclusion

Bolton Tooth-Size Discrepancy among Different Skeletal Malocclusion Groups

Comparison and analysis of alveolar bone structure characteristics in skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusion in the mandibular incisor region

A Preliminary Study of Buccal and Lingual Alveolar Bone Thickness of Posterior Teeth in Patients with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion and Mandibular Asymmetry

Morphological analysis of the alveolar bone of the anterior teeth in severe high-angle skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography

Archform Comparisons Between Skeletal Class Ii and Iii Malocclusions

A study of transverse maxillomandibular discrepancy and dental compensation in early mixed dentition with skeletal Class III malocclusion without posterior crossbite

The cranial base and maxillofacial morphology of Angle class Ⅱ malocclusion

Digital analyses of Bolton tooth size ratios and their association to gender, angle class, and other occlusal traits: a study using a partially automated digital 3D model analysis

THE STUDY OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CRANIAL BASE AND ANGLE CLASS II AND III MALOCCLUSION

Study on Tongue and Hyoid Bone Position in Class Ⅰ and Class Ⅱ Malocclusion

The relationship between over bite and the angle formed by anterior and posterior occlusal planes

Comparison of the Mesiodistal Angulations of Canine and Molar Teeth in Different Types of Orthodontic Malocclusions: A Retrospective Study

Study on the Relationship Between the Third Molar and Malocclusion

The effect of the thickness of the incisal edges on the accuracy when predicted with Bolton analysis

Three-dimensional Analysis of the Positional Relationship Between the Dentition and Basal Bone Region in Patients with Skeletal Class I and Class II Malocclusion with Mandibular Retrusion.

Orthodontic Tteatment in Patients with the Extraction of Maxillary Incisors and the Mandibular Premolars

Analysis of different Collum angles among different types of Angle malocclusion using CBCT

Analysis of Three-Dimensional Morphological Differences in the Mandible Between Skeletal Class I and Class II with CBCT Fixed-Point Measurement Method